I was thinking that there are not new kinds of evidence in support of evolution but just more of the same. More fossils have been found but it is still only fossils; the same type of evidence. So there is nothing new in that respect. I used *quality* and *quantity* for lack of better terms than I could think of at the moment and the meaning didn't come across clearly. I hope that helps make more sense of what I meant.
I don't deny by any means that the fossil record exists, and that there is plenty of evidence to support the age of the Earth. If you don't know from some of my posts, I'm not a YEC. I can even understand why and how people think the fossil record supports the ToE, but I don't accept it as a fact. I don't believe that there is any real contradiction between what the Bible teaches and what science discovers. If there appears to be one, then I think that it's just a matter of; we don't know how they fit together *YET*.
So, you are predicting that science will somehow confirm the Bible and that somehow, to paraphrase Rodney King, we'll all just get along. But there are countless religious or sacred accounts of Creation, which, by the way, as many here have pointed out, HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE THEORY OF EVOLUTION!!!!!!