You might try googling some more and find out if the woman obtained an annulment within the Catholic church. The first husband may have been an adulterer, etc.
But that wasn't actually my point. I was talking about the article and what was in the article, not what could be ferreted out by googling. My point was that it was many people's natural inclination to jump to conclusions that put the woman in the worst possible light, in spite of lack of evidence to support it (within the article).
We have become such a pessimissitic society.
Adultery does not provide an excuse for remarriage.
We have become such a pessimissitic society.
And once again, the pessimism was fully justified here.