Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dianna

What I meant was that this particular woman is not the only person who could raise these children. Many children go on to have wonderful loving adoptive parents after the death of their birth parents. By choosing to give her fourth child a chance a life, she is not dooming her other three children to a life without a family.


136 posted on 12/13/2005 4:33:59 PM PST by Burkean
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies ]


To: Burkean
By choosing to give her fourth child a chance a life, she is not dooming her other three children to a life without a family.

Sure, they will have family, but they won't have a mother. She chose NOT to mother them. All the adult perspective in the world won't help children to understand why their mother chose to leave them.

Why is the life of the unborn MORE important than the life of the mother? That is what is happening here. People aren't saying, "Both lives are important." The unborn is MORE important and overrides the mother's life PLUS the impact the mother's death would have on the rest of the family.

141 posted on 12/13/2005 5:15:32 PM PST by Dianna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson