Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: HairOfTheDog
"It think what they are saying is that one can treat the mother and save her, even at risk to the baby, but an overt act to abort the baby is not called for. IOW, it's OK to do the treatment. If the baby dies, it's not a sin.... And not an abortion."

Yes, HairOfTheDog, that's succinctly and exactly right.

131 posted on 12/13/2005 4:10:33 PM PST by Mrs. Don-o ("I have come that you might have life, and have it more abundantly.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies ]


To: Mrs. Don-o

Well, thanks, I though it was kindof clumsily said ;~D... but I can see the distinction. It's not an abortion for the health of the mother argument. It's a treatment for the mother at risk to the baby argument.


132 posted on 12/13/2005 4:13:57 PM PST by HairOfTheDog (Join the Hobbit Hole Troop Support - http://freeper.the-hobbit-hole.net/ 1,000 knives and counting!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson