Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: libertyman

No, my impression of the Shah is that he was a typical aristocrat, more along the lines of Prince Rainier of Monaco than a tyrant. He was full of himself, but had some right to be.

He was trying to modernize Iraq, educate people, get them into western clothes, get the burkhas off the women, bring them into the twentieth century, and so forth. One of the criticisms at the time is that he was trying to Americanize the people too fast, and they weren't ready for it yet.

The Iranians are Persians, not Arabs, and he wanted them to remember that, too.

Naturally all that modernizing, the clothes and movies and music, scandalized the Mullahs, and they used charges of westernizing corruption against him. But I think he would have survived the troubles if Carter hadn't pulled the rug out from under him.


65 posted on 12/13/2005 10:15:37 AM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]


To: Cicero
I had the pleasure of being in Iran for 2 years as an American contractor. Some of the programs the Shah instituted were: roads, hospitals, freedom for women, banks movies and such. He upgraded his military to the point where it was a stabilizing force in the Middle East.
67 posted on 12/13/2005 10:23:41 AM PST by NY Attitude (You are responsible for your safety until the arrival of Law Enforcement Officers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson