Skip to comments.
Airborne Laser Completes Laser Ground Tests
Boeing ^
| December 12, 2005
| Maria McCullough
Posted on 12/12/2005 4:02:19 PM PST by Paul Ross
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-31 last
To: Paul Ross
Only a nose mounted turret ? Just launch the missles behind them ;-)
21
posted on
12/12/2005 6:53:45 PM PST
by
festus
(The constitution may be flawed but its a whole lot better than what we have now.)
To: Paul Ross
"...and could only deliver one-ninth the destructive energy per gram as a conventional bomb."
But kinetic energy... That's a very important difference, and the tool probably has a place. For each contractor to survive a theoretical exchange, others must also be successful. [g]
22
posted on
12/12/2005 7:42:58 PM PST
by
familyop
("Let us try" sounds better, don't you think? "Essayons" is so...Latin.)
To: Tailgunner Joe
23
posted on
12/12/2005 7:49:37 PM PST
by
familyop
("Let us try" sounds better, don't you think? "Essayons" is so...Latin.)
To: Paul Ross
To: GSlob
Hmm... but what would happen if the enemy warhead [and the body of the missile, if need be] are given high quality mirror finish/coating? These would not degrade by themselves until burning off on re-entry, i.e. uncomfortably close to the intended target. No, but it would make the missile look quite spectacular on radar, and that much more easier to knock down with something else (THAAD, etc).
To: GSlob
That is a one of many reasons why the beam isn't truly continuous, the beam is actually pulsed, at a very high rate though, doing this actually allows for more energy to reach the target and do more damage during the engagement
26
posted on
12/13/2005 9:42:27 AM PST
by
Texas Patriot
(Remember.... The Alamo, never forget HOORAHH!!!!!)
To: md2576
The Laser is constantly adjusted by high speed computer to adjust the focal point to the target...otherwise the beam is not as effective...just like a handheld magnifying glass must be sharply focused to light a fire...
27
posted on
12/13/2005 4:15:03 PM PST
by
Turborules
(Liberal Ideas today as always are a Oxymoron)
To: Paul Ross
Could this shoot down conventional fighter craft...that sort of thing? If so, air wars are obsolete!
28
posted on
12/14/2005 12:41:00 PM PST
by
mdmathis6
(Proof against evolution:"Man is the only creature that blushes, or needs to" M.Twain)
To: mdmathis6
Could this shoot down conventional fighter craft...that sort of thing?Yes. More than that, it could also intercept Air-to-Air missiles...not just supersonic, but the upcoming next-generation hypersonic AA missiles.
If so, air wars are obsolete!
Uh, not quite. It is certainly a step forward. I would compare it's value to AWACs. It will seriously change the battlescape, and add an additional tool to the arsenal...that leverages all our others. But its still an early unproven prototype, and relatively "primitive" technology with limitations, i.e., the ability to stay airborne on station, within useful range, and operable...all of these factors perhaps impaired by weather...are all issues that need to weighed in every combat situation.
29
posted on
12/15/2005 6:50:23 AM PST
by
Paul Ross
(My idea of American policy toward the Soviet Union is simple...It is this, 'We win and they lose.')
To: Paul Ross
These lasers could theoretically be ship based, correct and could knock down antiship missiles?
30
posted on
12/15/2005 9:40:37 AM PST
by
mdmathis6
(Proof against evolution:"Man is the only creature that blushes, or needs to" M.Twain)
To: mdmathis6
Yes.
That is why the new generation DDX Destroyer/Cruiser is crucial. It is setting the Navy up to be able to deploy Directed Energey weaponry, from rail guns to lasers. This will allow the ships to be secure against the most-dangerous of aerial assaults.
This will then just leave the problem of torpedoes...
31
posted on
12/15/2005 9:47:25 AM PST
by
Paul Ross
(My idea of American policy toward the Soviet Union is simple...It is this, 'We win and they lose.')
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-31 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson