Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: minus_273
This post has got to hurt the "innocent until proven guilty" crowd. It'll ptobably also put a serious smackdown on the crowd all in to that "logic" garbage. That fact is, this lady died, she had been "taking" pot in a modified medicinal form, so therefore pot kills. See? Logic!

How about waiting until the report comes back to see if maybe, just possibly, her being diabetic had anything at all to do with her death? A person that age, already into neopathy to that stage... not terribly surprising there'd be a death involved. Better check what she ate. We might find that Twinkies kill, or roast beef kills. Sure would hurt the "food is good for you" crowd then, wouldn't it? There's a huge difference between circumstantial evidence, guilt by association, and cause and effect.

88 posted on 12/12/2005 12:37:11 PM PST by Jokelahoma (Animal testing is a bad idea. They get all nervous and give wrong answers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Jokelahoma

A few observations.

She took the sativex for 23 days. Then was admitted to the hospital, and died 5 months later. So for the 5 months prior to her dying she did not take the substance. Not sure how then that was what killed her, considering her many other health related problems.

She died over a year and a half ago. All this time and just now they are going to investigate the death? Seems to me this is another phishing expidition to try to pin this death on THC. Chalk up another 'victory' inthe war on drugs.


97 posted on 12/12/2005 12:56:26 PM PST by bird4four4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson