If any of you take this to mean the metaphysically natural science of biology, you are in the wrong room – please go to the South wing, and ask for professor Dawkins’ laboratory, the course name is "atheism 101"
Dawkins' quote "Science does not produce evidence against God. Science and religion ask different questions" sounds more to me like methodological naturalism.
If any of you reject methodological naturalism as a presupposition in science, then please proceed to the North wing and ask for professor Behe’s laboratory, the course name is "intelligent design 101"
And to be fair to the previous example, you might want to say "theology 101."
I find the Dawkins quotation you selected to be rather fascinating in that it loses context when one does not consider the full context of Dawkins’ biography, publications, debates, political and ideological activism and so on: Wikipedia on Dawkins The quote is indeed methodological naturalism, but his ideology is clearly atheism, metaphysical naturalism. And he (like the folks at infidels.org) use circular reasoning to conclude that methodological naturalism proves metaphysical naturalism – i.e. one should not be surprised to find answers in nature when that is the only place they are looking.
Your other suggestion, that “intelligent design 101” ought to be labeled “theology 101” is not correct because intelligent design has no Holy writ, articles of faith or doctrine. The objective of the movement (as compared to hypothesis) is to eliminate naturalism as a presupposition.
However, I do agree the metaphor ought to be expanded to show where creationism would fit. So here goes:
All of you who believe God created the universe, which is creationism per se, please step to the back of the room for a moment. Ok, you guys in the front of the room: if any of you reject methodological naturalism as a presupposition in science, then please proceed to the North wing and ask for professor Behe’s laboratory, the course name is "intelligent design 101". (walking to the back of the room)
All of you who believe God created the universe and then did nothing further (Deists) – please move back to the front of the room, your beliefs will not get in the way. All of you who believe God created an old-looking universe at some time in the past (Gosse Omphalos hypothesis) – please move to the front of the room because your theology could mean anything from last Thursday to millennia or more and won’t interfere with the class.
Ok, now, those of you who believe God created the universe including evolution as His tool and that Adam was the first ensouled man (Catholics and the majority of Christians) – please move to the front of the room, your theology will not interfere.
Those of you who believe everything in Scripture but say the age of the universe is explained by relativity and inflationary theory (6000 years from the inception space/time coordinates approximately is 15 billion years for our space/time coordinates), proceed to the North wing and ask for professor Behe’s laboratory, the course name is "intelligent design 101".
Now, all of you that remain who do not believe the universe was created some 6,000 years ago and Adam was the first mortal man (Young Earth Creationism) - please go back to admissions, I don’t have a clue where you belong.
The rest of you here in the back of the room are Young Earth Creationists, please go to Morris’ classroom, “Biblical literalism 101”. (walking to the front of the room)
Whew. Ok, now all of you who remain in this classroom – we will be learning and doing biology with the presumption, not the metaphysics, of naturalism. If any of you try to bring your own ideology or metaphysics to the lab, you will be ejected from the class altogether.” LOL!