Fraud doesn't have to be very widespread or even very well organized to make a difference. Just a few people "encouraged" to cast fraudulent ballots, here and there, in various precincts, is enough to make a difference in a close race. And, not surprisingly, in most of them, the 'Rats somehow manage to come out ahead. Isn't that just the most amazing coinky-dink? The recent WA state governor's race is perhaps the most egregious example, but this race is another. I lived through the '84 robbery in the Indiana 8th district, so thievery by the 'Rats is an all-too unpleasant experience.
Many Democrats believe that fraud is alright if done in the name of "democracy" or "the people" or the "democratic process" or "helping the downtrodden."