Yes.
Yes.
But enough about what I'd say to you in a darkened room.
Should you decide the roman à clef is not your cup of tea, you definitely have a future writing for Groucho. ;)
AFTERWORD
I was wrong about Pirro's character and courage.
But I still believe that ideologically, politically, Pirro is better suited than Spencer to defeat hillary in New York.
Jeanine has the CV to smash hillary, but she apparently doesn't have the character or the guts to use it.
(Spencer apparently does. I say that with this caveat, tho: Unlike Pirro, Spencer has nothing to lose.
There is much less downside for him to take on hillary.)
(Perhaps his advice was all about helping her in her next race and helping hillary in this one.) |
|
December 7, 1941+64 RE: a not-so-modest proposal concerning hillary clinton
Hillary Clinton's revisionist tome notwithstanding, 'living history' begets a certain symmetry. It is in that light that I make this not-so-modest proposal on this day, exactly 64 years after the attack on Pearl Harbor. The context of our concern today--regardless of political affiliation--is Iraq and The War on Terror, but the larger fear is that our democracy may not survive. We have the requisite machines, power and know-how to defeat the enemy in Iraq and elsewhere, but do we have the will? In particular, do we have the will to identify and defeat the enemy in our midst? Answerable to no one, heir apparent in her own mind, self-serving in the extreme, Hillary Clinton incarnates this insidious new threat to our survival. What we decide to do about Missus Clinton will tell us much about what awaits us in these perilous new times. COMPLETE LETTER |