Posted on 12/12/2005 5:06:57 AM PST by Mia T
"Clinton harbors presidential ambitions..."
Hillary Clinton does not just "harbors", she is possessed by presidential ambition. Hillary's megalomaniacal sense of her entitlement combined with her singular powerlust is so palpable it forms a toxic aura about her. Her coarse voice carrying her duplicitious speech emits noxious fumes and conjures threatening images - makes me shiver and shutter. HOWEVER, after addressing Red China's University students, the students voted then first lady Hillary Clinton having the best speech style for propaganda. The students praised Hillary's short and incisive sentences. (Hummm...style over substance.) I anticipate Hillary Clinton's great fall from supra hubris once she loses re-election to the U.S. senate. If Hillary wins, her momentum accelerates toward the presidency.
.
NEVER FORGET
DICK MORRIS confirmed on Talk Radio 3 years ago that BILL CLINTON personally refused offers from the Sudan in 1995 & 1996 to give us OSAMA bin LADEN on a silver platter =
911 Lifesaving Hero RICK RESCORLA, R.I.P.
http://www.RickRescorla.com
http://www.strategyzoneonline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=24361
The only reason DICK MORRIS couldn't confirm the 3rd CLINTON refusal in 2000 was because he was no longer working in CLINTON White House. This per DICK MORRIS himself in his Judicial Watch Report Talk Radio appearance.
Signed:.."ALOHA RONNIE" Guyer
(A Freeper calling into this Radio Show who got DICK MORRIS to admit all this on the air for the first time)
NEVER FORGET
.
Check out Mia T's profile for further ENIGHTENMENT ;)
Not For Dial Up Connections !
frappe jusqu' au dessus!
thx. will be editing/updating profile page shortly.
"if she can't carry New York, how can she win the presidency?"
Does anyone in New York or in America feel threatened at the very thought of having the Clintons - the diabolical duo - back in the White House and posturing at America's helm? Hillary as "commander in chief" would sell us out to our enemies and hand over America's sovereignty to the United Nations. I don't advocate military coups, but if president, Hillary would deserve a military coup, as would Unfit John Kerry.
While our military faces the enemy in the Near East, America's domestic enemies stab the military in the back.
Merry Christmas and Happy Holiday Season,
and God Bless America's Military.
One day a fourth-grade teacher asked the children what their fathers did
for a living. All the typical answers came up-fireman, mechanic, businessman,
salesman, doctor, lawyer, and so forth.
But little Justin was being uncharacteristically quiet, so when the
teacher prodded him about his father, he replied, "My father's an exotic dancer
in a gay cabaret and takes off all his clothes in front of other men and they
put money in his underwear. Sometimes, if the offer is really good, he will go home with some guy and make love with him for money."
The teacher, obviously shaken by this statement, hurriedly set the other
children to work on some exercises and then took little Justin aside to
ask him, "Is that really true about your father?" "No," the boy said, "He works for
the Democratic National Committee and is helping to secure the nomination
of Hilary Clinton, but I was too embarrassed to say that in front of the
other kids."
I could not agree with you more!!!
Sad day in our Country when a slime clinton takes another office, ANY office....
page 2 bump
****
Yes. Ever since the toe sucking has seemed to end in his, poll-taking, bloated life, he's losing it.
One could tell that Morris was still on the Clinton payroll when he ginned up the "Condi is the only person who can derail the Hillary Express" movement.
While our military faces the enemy in the Near East,
America's domestic enemies stab the military in the back.
Merry Christmas and Happy Holiday Season,
and God Bless America's Military.--purpleland
bill clinton made page one of Al Jazeera today. A schizophrenic mix of schadenfreude and agitprop, it was the story of an impeached ex-president of America trashing America--to standing Os--in the Arab state of Dubai--in the middle of a war zone--only several hundred miles from the American troops--American troops protecting his--and his missus'--sorry, seditious, pusillanimous, collective _ _ _. And, to rub it in, the traitor pocketed no less than $200,000 from the enemy for his troubles. Having failed to snare the Nobel Peace Prize by ignoring terrorism, clinton has apparently decided to intensify his America-bashing on foreign soil, the method employed by Jimmy Carter to great (if somewhat belated) effect. (The Nobel committee, sufficiently mollified only after 24 years of the peanut president's America-bashing, awarded Carter his 1978 Peace Prize finally in 2002.) Meanwhile, back in the Senate, the missus, the other half of the clinton construct, maintains her hawkish pose (although not without bird problems of another sort). Yet another example of the clinton conflation ploy, (see SCHEMA PINOCCHIO: how the clintons are handling the hillary dud factor), this variant allows "clinton, the construct" to hold two mutually exclusive positions simultaneously, thereby enabling the missus to avoid in '08 the trap that repeatedly ensnared the ever 'nuanced' Kerry in '04. Do you now understand how stupid the clintons think you are? This legacy confab is in and of itself proof certain of clinton's deeply flawed character, and a demonstration in real time of the way in which the clinton years were about a legacy that was incidentally a presidency. Madeleine Albright captured the essence of this dysfunctional presidency best when she explained why clinton couldn't go after bin Laden. According to Richard Miniter, the Albright revelation occurred at the cabinet meeting that would decide the disposition of the USS Cole bombing by al Qaeda [that is to say, that would decide to do what it had always done when a "bimbo" was not spilling the beans on the clintons: Nothing]. Only Clarke wanted to retaliate militarily for this unambiguous act of war. Albright explained that a [sham] Mideast accord would yield [if not peace for the principals, surely] a Nobel Peace Prize for clinton. Kill or capture bin Laden and clinton could kiss the 'accord' and the Peace Prize good-bye. If clinton liberalism, smallness, cowardice, corruption, perfidy--and, to borrow a phrase from Andrew Cuomo, clinton cluelessness--played a part, it was, in the end, the Nobel Peace Prize that produced the puerile pertinacity that enabled the clintons to shrug off terrorism's global danger.
C-SPAN asked noted presidential historians to rank the American presidents1 along the following ten dimensions: public persuasion, crisis leadership, economic management, moral authority, international relations, administrative skills, relations with congress, vision/setting an agenda, pursued equal justice for all, and performance within context of times. bill clinton emerged as middling in most dimensions; he was surpassed in others by a settled mediocrity (Carter) and a putative failure (Nixon). In moral authority, bill clinton was rated dead last.2 He did fairly well in public persuasion, not a surprising finding given the volume of snake oil he managed to peddle during his putative presidency. "It's NOT the economy, stupid!" Clinton's best scores were on the economic management and pursued equal justice for all dimensions. However, both of these results are meaningful only insofar as they redound to the moral authority dimension: they are wholly based on clinton fraudulence, cooked books and black poses, respectively; and clinton's shameless Rosa Parks eulogy last week assured us that the insidious brand of clinton racism is alive and well during these tiptoe years of what the clintons hope will be their interregnum. Note that although Brinkley doesn't place much importance on the economic management dimension--he argues that the economy variable is not durable over time--he fails to recognize that the evaluation of the clinton economy by the historians is erroneous to begin with. Note also that C-SPAN historians found no evidence of clinton "greatness" irrespective of his moral-authority deficit, contrary to Douglas Brinkley's claim made at the clinton revisionist confab3. (NOTE: Later research has revealed that Brinkley's qualified mention of clinton "greatness" was not a claim but rather a polite guest's white lie about an abject loser. Instead of taking the AP report at face value, one must carefully parse Brinkley's actual words and especially note the subjunctive construction.) MIDDLING
If 9/11 taught us anything, it is that presidential character and moral authority count, and count most.4 If the variables are properly weighted, bill clinton will always come out dead last. That is, unless Americans are dumb enough to make the same mistake twice. Mia T, 11.10.05 COPYRIGHT MIA T 2004
by Mia T, 11.17.05
id you see it? More to the point, did the American press?
h e a r --c l i n t o n --l o s e --i t
by Mia T, 11.11.05
COMPLETE ARTICLE
Twenty presidents rank higher than bill clinton and 20 rank lower. But this placement assumes equal weight for each of the dimensions. And therein lies the flaw.
Historian massages clinton numbers, ego + legacy at revisionist confab
C-SPAN historians find no clinton "greatness" irrespective of moral-authority deficit
by Mia T, 11.14.05
(viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available HERE)
CHENEY: CALL THEM REPREHENSIBLE
THE DEMOCRATS ARE GONNA GET US KILLED (kerry, clinton + sandy berger's pants) SERlES5
THE LEFT'S RECKLESS TET-OFFENSIVE-GAMBIT REPLAY:
the left's jihad against America is killing our troops, aiding + abetting the terrorists and imperiling all Americans
pro-islamofascist-terrorist radical chic
WHY THE LEFT IS DANGEROUS FOR AMERICA
The Left's Fatally Flawed "Animal Farm" Mentality
(Why America Must NEVER AGAIN Elect a Democrat President)
sandy berger haberdashery feint
(the specs, not the pants or the socks)
A CALL TO IMPEACH CLINTON IN ABSENTIA
I don't know. Sometimes he makes perfect sense, and sometimes, it's like he's huffing the Odor-Eaters again.
<< frappe jusqu' au dessus! >>
Mais oui, Ma Belle!
Certainement!
Jusqu au dessus!
;)
The sensible anti-clinton stuff is needed to shore up his questionable bona fides. But note that that stuff is never dispositive.
OTOH, his 'failed' strategies always redound (positively) to the clintons.
Merci :)
;)
The sensible anti-clinton stuff is needed to shore up his questionable bona fides. But note that that stuff is never dispositive.
OTOH, his nonsensical strategies are always dispositive and redound (positively) to the clintons.
Isn't that the same thing??
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.