Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: chadwimc
What's "dangerous" about recoil? A person only lets that scope smack 'em upside the head once(Well, a smart person learns "eye relief" after the first time). Can you say "magnum eye"?

I don't think it's dangerous either, but I will say that for people without a history of shooting, firing a hard recoiling rifle will help them develop a flinch. I've shot M-14s with the standard steel butt-plates, and after a few hundred rounds, your shoulder begins to get sore. That's not the case with my Fed Ord.

Mark

20 posted on 12/11/2005 10:05:53 PM PST by MarkL (I swear by my pretty floral bonnet that I will end you! (I just saw "Safe" again last night!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: MarkL

You're on the ball, mate. Who cares about a bit of recoil, it's only natural. What's more important to me is the properties of the ammunition, and in my opinion, the 5.56 only does half the job. Whatever you hit with the 7.62 (.308) goes down and won't get up, and that's the bottom line. Most of the people I know that were trained with the 7.62 would be more than willing to carry the extra weight because they know the capabilities of the weapon justify every little bit.


21 posted on 12/11/2005 10:28:56 PM PST by Bazooka (Just say what you think. They hate our guts anyway.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson