Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: oceanview
"Schundler lost because he didn't get enough votes, NJ is another state where this mythical "hidden vote" simply does not exist."

I get a kick out of those bellyaching how Pirro was "treated" upon her announcement of running, yet we see the political corpses of Conservatives who have been kneecapped by corrupt, statist RINOs who want to keep their party pure for their ilk and to preserve their ever-dwindling base of power. People like Schundler were very great threats to the RINO establishment, because they rose through politics without their help and proved, to their chagrin, that CONSERVATIVE solutions to problems when applied WORK. Schundler was a threat that had to be destroyed, and the mission was accomplished. Now thanks to the stellar work of the NJ RINOs, the Republican party is in its worst shape since after Watergate, has lost seats at the state level in EVERY SINGLE ELECTION since 1993, and continues its slide towards complete irrelevence until it reaches the morbidity of Massachusetts Republicanism (buried with absolutely finality by William Weld, who is chomping at the bit to repeat this task in New York like the good Trojan Democrat that he is). If running these "moderates" (sic) were the solution, NJ would be overflowing with "Republicans" from Cape May to High Point. They're not. Until that reality is recognized, nothing will ever change. RINOs remain the cancer on the party and need to be excised with extreme prejudice.

104 posted on 12/11/2005 8:27:58 PM PST by fieldmarshaldj (Cheney X -- Destroying the Liberal Democrat Traitors By Any Means Necessary -- Ya Dig ? Sho 'Nuff.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]


To: fieldmarshaldj

don't tell me that the demographics in these states are not changing - they are. its not just the "party" apparatus.

long island, where I live, used to have a solid group of republican congressman. they have all been tossed out for Dems, only one (Peter King) is left. they lost not because they were RINOs, or because the party "screwed" them - they lost because the demographics of the districts changed, they didn't appeal to and get enough votes, the Dem challengers did and were elected.


226 posted on 12/12/2005 1:04:40 PM PST by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson