Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: beyond the sea; Peach

I haven't seen the shows yet....but, from what I have read about what Graham said, he didn't just go squishy on the war....he totally misrepresented BUSH'S reasons for going to war...

President Bush NEVER said that there was a link between 9/11 and Saddam...and yet, Graham says today that that part of the evidence "fell apart"????

How can something fall apart if it was never "together"???

This is the stuff the DEMS do...going around putting Bush's evidence down about things that was never alledged.

GRAHAM just totally wiped out the GOOD that was done this last week by Howard Dean going so extreme.


210 posted on 12/11/2005 7:00:24 AM PST by Txsleuth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies ]


To: Txsleuth

Graham was horrible today. Worse than usual. At the very least it would have been nice if he'd mentioned that Clinton's Justice Department knew there was a link between AQ and Iraq because the federal indictment against Osama bin Laden mentions that AQ will NOT attack Iraq in exchange for weapons development.

Now that sounds exactly like an arrangement and relationship to me.


261 posted on 12/11/2005 7:37:16 AM PST by Peach (The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies ]

To: Txsleuth
GRAHAM just totally wiped out the GOOD that was done this last week by Howard Dean going so extreme.

If not, he sure seemed to try.

404 posted on 12/11/2005 8:45:17 AM PST by beyond the sea (Murtha: Redeployment - What .......Surrender? // “Victory is not a strategy”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies ]

To: Txsleuth

Good


411 posted on 12/11/2005 8:46:29 AM PST by MNJohnnie (Now the Democrat leadership claims that accurately quoting them is "attack politics")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies ]

To: Txsleuth

You


413 posted on 12/11/2005 8:46:41 AM PST by MNJohnnie (Now the Democrat leadership claims that accurately quoting them is "attack politics")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies ]

To: Txsleuth

Here


415 posted on 12/11/2005 8:46:54 AM PST by MNJohnnie (Now the Democrat leadership claims that accurately quoting them is "attack politics")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies ]

To: Txsleuth

make


416 posted on 12/11/2005 8:47:04 AM PST by MNJohnnie (Now the Democrat leadership claims that accurately quoting them is "attack politics")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies ]

To: Txsleuth

1500


417 posted on 12/11/2005 8:47:15 AM PST by MNJohnnie (Now the Democrat leadership claims that accurately quoting them is "attack politics")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies ]

To: Txsleuth

Now


418 posted on 12/11/2005 8:47:26 AM PST by MNJohnnie (Now the Democrat leadership claims that accurately quoting them is "attack politics")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson