I do not claim to be identical to Mike, but we were both in agreement that it was too early to draw conclusions. Until you began insulting us and trying to pit us against each other, you claimed to hold the same position we do. You changed your position when you began harassing others who held the same view. So explain your real reason for harassing me, and lying about me. I see now that it has nothing to do with anything I've said on this thread. What previous thread are you carrying a grudge over? Does this have anything to do with some other site that you may be a member of?
Don't you think the most obvious question should be "why are you and Mike the ONLY ones on this thread I've had a disagreement with?"
You keep scrambling around looking for a way out of this without losing face, whether it's pinging the Lead Mod to come to your rescue, or accusing me of every manner of malfeasance but the kidnapping of the Lindberg Baby, and you don't see you've *already lost* face.
You were not the first to say the authorities shouldn't try to draw conclusions without a proper investigation. You were the first to say they ARE making conclusions without a proper investigation.
Canard already pointed out you have no basis to be critical of the authorities decision to dismiss the "ear-witness" reports, but other than your not liking it, I can find no reason for you to question that decision.