[COEXERJ145]

Take, for instance, the first plane to crash into the World Trade Center.

Until the second plane showed up, there was no proof it was terrorism.

[RegulatorCountry]

"Until the second plane showed up, there was no proof it was terrorism."

There was no proof it wasn't either, but that didn't stop authorities from making the claim that it wasn't. Ever wonder how many people in the second tower could have been saved, if not for a false sense of security derived from being told that this was just an isolated incident?

[AmeriBrit]

Maybe you don't realize there are some of us members here that either live in the immediate area or those of us who have family in the immediate vicinity and we'd like to know the truth rather than some 'fluff' thrown at us like what happened in this case WITHIN MINUTES of the disaster occuring.
There were reports of a plane being both heard and seen by witnesses but again within minutes these reports were disputed. How the h*** could they know? The area was fully ablaze and no-one could get anywhere near to judge whether it was an accident or terrorists. If there's the slightest inkling it was terrorists, I want to know so I'm aware of what my kids are up against.

[AmeriBrit]

"Until the second plane showed up, there was no proof it was terrorism."

I'd like to bet a large sum 'Slick Wiley' knew immediately, without the 2nd plane hitting the WTC, that it was terrorism on 9/11.

[brytlea]

And none that it wasn't.
susie