Just seems a little bizzare to me to take the police making a comment that they have no evidence of this not being an accident as evidence in favour of it not being an accident. Maybe just me.
BBC TV..this is a very large depot..with 24 hour a day operations..and supplies fuel for heathrow airport? although that doesn' make sense becuase it wasn't jet fuel..maybe they meant it supplies feul for heathrow airport support vechciles or something
Point well taken, but there is a big difference between it was an accident and we don't yet have a reason to believe it was anything but an accident. From what I heard, they were already declaring it to be an accident. How could they declare that with certainty at this stage? But maybe I didn't hear it correctly.
Perhaps this can be chalked up to a cultural difference. I think alot of American Freepers are very skeptical when the government rushes out immediately after any event like this and declares that terrorism was not involved.