Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: McLynnan
Couldn't agree more and I'm in the health care field. Compared to the general population I've got it good in terms of cost of coverage, but I can only use network MD's and services. When I travel I'm up the creek if I need medical care -- I'll have to pay 50% of the cost which can be substantial if I were involved in a car wreck, had a heart attack, etc. It would make much more sense to say "we're going to give you $X per month for health care -- go find the plan that suits your needs." The employer would be freed up from the annual shopping and negotiating with insurance companies, and the consumer could buy a plan that fits their situation. Competition for the business would regulate the marketplace.

PING-DA-DING-DING-DING!!!! (Crazy Frog ping!)

42 posted on 12/10/2005 2:22:54 PM PST by paulat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]


To: paulat

Very good. NASE is cheaper coverage and better.


74 posted on 12/10/2005 3:32:39 PM PST by stephenjohnbanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson