The universe is always newsworthy.
To: VadeRetro; Junior; longshadow; RadioAstronomer; Doctor Stochastic; js1138; Shryke; RightWhale; ...
SciencePing |
An elite subset of the Evolution list. See the list's explanation at my freeper homepage. Then FReepmail to be added or dropped. |
|
|
|
2 posted on
12/10/2005 11:50:32 AM PST by
PatrickHenry
(Virtual Ignore for trolls, lunatics, dotards, common scolds, & incurable ignoramuses.)
To: PatrickHenry
Have they decided on the fate of Hubble yet?
3 posted on
12/10/2005 11:53:36 AM PST by
A.Hun
To: PatrickHenry
...Advances in computer technology now allow us to simulate the entire universe...In a coarsely gridded sort of way.
4 posted on
12/10/2005 11:55:41 AM PST by
Doctor Stochastic
(Vegetabilisch = chaotisch ist der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
To: PatrickHenry
Invisible, yet undoubtedly there scientists can measure its effects its exact characteristics remain elusive.
Unlike normal matter particles, physicists believe, they do not collide and scatter like billiard balls but rather simply pass through each other.
Collisonless? Invisible? Apparently do not interact with other matter, including dark matter? Yet, dark matter shapes most of the universe?
I'll bet that changes in these theories will be forthcoming in the near or slightly more distant future. Tough I probably won't be around to read about it.
6 posted on
12/10/2005 12:34:13 PM PST by
adorno
To: PatrickHenry
The universe is always newsworthy. Another story about the same dumb ol' universe. Doesn't anyone ever broaden out a little?
9 posted on
12/10/2005 12:44:03 PM PST by
VadeRetro
(Liberalism is a cancer on society. Creationism is a cancer on conservatism.)
To: PatrickHenry
"it is very challenging to verify the simulation results observationally"
Really? (Not surprisingly!)
16 posted on
12/10/2005 2:14:07 PM PST by
LLoyd George
(more speculation games - cosmology style)
To: PatrickHenry
"Dark matter [is] invisible, yet undoubtedly there"
You can count me as a doubter. Dark matter is a contrivance to fill the gaps in otherwise sensible theories.
I find it much easier to believe the fine structure constant and light velocity have changed over the history of the universe.
To me this is a more rational explanation of measurements that seem to indicate an accelerating universe and gravity with no apparent matter.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson