Posted on 12/10/2005 7:03:08 AM PST by Mia T
Flattering me, (and using a quaint, endearing colloquialism like "heck" to boot!), will not make me change my stubborn, principled mind. :^)
Ickes seem to have had a falling out with the Clintons after his debacle of a run for chairman of the DNC.
Not sure what happened, but he wound up dropping out, then endorsing Dean, and made some critical comments.
Either way, unless they patch and make up, he is done with the Clintons now.
You talk a good game for a Jewish gal who can't even bake honey cakes. :^)
Thanks for your hard work in compiling all this, Mia T. That was the first time I was able to see the Estrich clip from the O'Reilly Factor. Good grief. Obviously Susan Sychofant would be an excellent choice for Hilary's VP. Unbelievable.
;)
thanx. It was an amazing interview.
;)
"I'm one of the few in the semi-inner circle who [doesn't] think she can win" [the White House]. Harold Ickes |
GEFFEN UNLOADS ON HILLARY: 'SHE CAN'T WIN' Sen. Hillary Clinton should not count on help from Hollywood mogul David Geffen in her possible run for the White House. Geffen, who was a generous supporter and pal of Bill Clinton when he was president, trashed Hillary's prospects last night during a Q&A at the 92nd St. Y in New York City. "She can't win, and she's an incredibly polarizing figure," the billionaire Democrat told his audience. "And ambition is just not a good enough reason." Lloyd Grove reports in fresh editions of the NY DAILY NEWS the audience broke with "hearty applause" over Geffen's comments. Developing... |
Don't be surprised to see Joe Lieberman run.....I think enough time will have passed since the Gore fiasco, and I think he'll have a good shot at capturing the Democrat nomination.....he'll capture many swing voters.
Hillary is nothing more than an ultra-liberal marxist, fit for the voters stupid enough to elect her. Perhaps she may want to try running for the Chinese Communist Party chairmanship.
Never underestimate either of the Clintons ability to mount a political campaign. Bill won twice in spite of the obvious scandals and Hill did easily win in NY.
I agree. We must not underestimate their ruthlessness... or their machine. However, without their machine, (the clinton 'infrastructure'), they are, taken one at a time, or even as the 'twofer,' (one could argue, especially as the 'twofer'), insufferable mediocrities, not half as smart as their PR would have us believe.... (When clinton promised us 'two for the price of one,' did he understand at the time that one was not enough?)
Missus clinton, in particular, is maintained daily by all manner of device, including, but not limited to: the zipper-hoist, the throne, the complex question and other sleights of hand, and, of course, the jackboot. ![]() (viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available HERE)
We must remain united. We, all of us, must put aside our pet problems and personal preferences, however critical, and vote en masse for whichever candidate the GOP serves up. What we decide to do about missus clinton will tell us much about what awaits us in these perilous new times. What we decide to do about missus clinton will tell us much about ourselves. |
|
Dont slight her , she is dangerous. She will have the media %100 on her side.She will have the majority of women voting for her , she will have massive funds behind her .
Not true. Especially when we get done with her.
As I argue above, the white women demographic, the only real swing vote, has turned red because of the threat of terrorism. We will reinforce and expand that political realignment with additional information on the clintons.
bump
ping
ping
bump
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.