Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: prion
"It isn't. There was no way of knowing ahead of time the baby could be carried to full term, and that early in the process the chances of spontaneous abortion are still high. A month. That's early. "Strong will to live" doesn't enter into it at four weeks. If both baby and mother had died, what would that have served?"

It's true there was no way of knowing if the baby would have aborted early or not. However, if it had aborted naturally she could have then received treatment. But as long as the baby was alive and growing, this true Mother who truly lived up to the name of "Mother" (unlike so many women of today), did what was right: she left the decision for life and death in God's hands, rather than taking it into her own. He could have preserved her life also, or caused the baby to abort naturally, but He didn't.

If both had died, what would it have served? That's not for us to answer. It is ours to be obedient to Him and leave the consequences to Him, whatever they may be. Death sometimes serves His purpsoes more than life does, especially when we realize that physical death is not the end of one's life.

21 posted on 12/10/2005 9:46:26 AM PST by TruthSetsUFree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: TruthSetsUFree
IMO, your words are beautiful, true and final!
Well said!
22 posted on 12/10/2005 10:29:28 AM PST by Guenevere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson