Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

[Mike] Wallace Ponders Whether Network News Will Survive
Internet Movie Database ^ | December 9, 2005 | IMDB.com

Posted on 12/09/2005 11:39:02 AM PST by 68skylark

Mike Wallace has bemoaned the state of television news in general and of 60 Minutes in particular. In an interview with the Boston Globe, Wallace remarked, "The days of Walter Cronkite and Huntley and Brinkley are gone. People still do watch, but it doesn't have the clout that it used to have. I don't know what's going to happen or if there will be an evening news 10 years from now. It's a very expensive operation to keep up." Wallace also lamented the falling ratings of his own 60 Minutes, where he has had the title of co-editor since 1968. "In the '70s, '80s, and '90s, we were always in the top 10," he said. "Now, it's different. But I think we've held onto our standards remarkably well, no thanks to me because I don't do the kinds of stuff I used to." Wallace, whose son Chris quit ABC to join Fox News Channel, also had words of praise for FNC's Chairman/CEO Roger Ailes. Ailes, he said, "is a man I admire very much. He understood there was a market that was not being served. He was right."


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: broadcastnews; liberalmedia; mikewallace
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last
People still do watch, but it doesn't have the clout that it used to have.

He's right about the second part of that sentence -- thanks heavens.

1 posted on 12/09/2005 11:39:02 AM PST by 68skylark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 68skylark
Well, it looks like another axiom has come true, pi$$ing on half your customers really is a bad business idea.
2 posted on 12/09/2005 11:41:08 AM PST by Tarpon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 68skylark

No doubt. Who wants to listen to these fossilized 1960's liberal hippies editorialize on 60 minutes.


3 posted on 12/09/2005 11:41:53 AM PST by GaltMeister (“All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 68skylark

The network news has tied its destiny to a political agenda, and will succeed or fail with that agenda. Fortunately, things aren't looking too good for them right now.


4 posted on 12/09/2005 11:43:33 AM PST by Spok (Est omnis de civilitate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 68skylark
People still do watch, but it doesn't have the clout that it used to have.

Now why should an objective reporter be concerned with "clout?"

5 posted on 12/09/2005 11:44:55 AM PST by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 68skylark

"People still do watch, but it doesn't have the clout that it used to have."

There is no real clout any more. Below is a great mental game/exercise to have fun with during the upcoming party season.

1. Ask people of all political backgrounds to name the major talking heads on the current evening news programs on ABCNNBCBS?

I have been doing this since mid November. No one knows any major talking heads. Most will say Blather, Jennings and Brokaw. Jennings died this year, Brokaw resigned and Blather was fired.

Then for the icing on the cake ask them who is the talking head on Nightline.


6 posted on 12/09/2005 11:46:00 AM PST by Grampa Dave (Link to Great TV ad re rat traitors and their words re Iraq: http://www.gop.com/Media/120905.wmv)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spok

It's cable availability. CNNs/Fox/MSNBC 24 hours. Nothing to do with politics.

If Fox had started an evening national news via its broadcasting stations it would be declining too.


7 posted on 12/09/2005 11:46:51 AM PST by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 68skylark
People still do watch, but it doesn't have the clout that it used to have.

The evidence of this, as I suspect Mike is surely rolling around in his mind, is that the House, Senate, and Presidency are in Republican hands. If the networks still had "clout", this would likely not be the case.

8 posted on 12/09/2005 11:47:27 AM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 68skylark

Die, MSM, die!


9 posted on 12/09/2005 11:47:30 AM PST by Aquinasfan (Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tarpon

GM did it and look where they are.


10 posted on 12/09/2005 11:48:49 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill

Well the news and analysis at the imdb.com doesn't really purport to be objective -- it's lives in a gray area of "news analysis" and celebrity gossip.


11 posted on 12/09/2005 11:49:15 AM PST by 68skylark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Comment #12 Removed by Moderator

To: 68skylark

Less clout? Thats because shows like "60 Minutes" are caught in overt acts of fraud like the Bush fake national guard memo case.


13 posted on 12/09/2005 11:52:31 AM PST by KC_Conspirator (This space outsourced to India)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 68skylark

Brings a tear to my eye.


14 posted on 12/09/2005 11:54:47 AM PST by 2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten (Is your problem ignorance or apathy? I don't know and I don't care.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave

That's a great exercise. I couldn't name any of the current crop. But then turn it around and ask:

1. Name a top host of talk radio.
2. Name a popular television host of a political show.


15 posted on 12/09/2005 11:55:15 AM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Comment #16 Removed by Moderator

To: 68skylark
"In the '70s, '80s, and '90s, we were always in the top 10," he said. "Now, it's different. But I think we've held onto our standards remarkably well,

Yes, remarkably well. The show was full of distortions, over simplification and outright falsehoods then and it remains filled with them today. The standards were low and the 70s, 80s and 90s and they are still low today.

17 posted on 12/09/2005 11:57:27 AM PST by Ditto ( No trees were killed in sending this message, but billions of electrons were inconvenienced.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GaltMeister


The MSM reminds me of an episode right out of Star Trek, Patterns of Force – Episode 52
18 posted on 12/09/2005 11:58:47 AM PST by TheForceOfOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 68skylark

Network News has not existed in my house for 20 years. Hell network television has not existed in my house for over 10.
Well, there is NFL and NASCAR.


19 posted on 12/09/2005 12:01:23 PM PST by Long Distance Rider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 68skylark

"...it doesn't have the clout that it used to have"

In other words, Wallace, Rather, Brokaw, Jennings, Cronkite, et al., ad nauseum, thought that they were demi-gods and could preach to the peons from their lofty perches in the network newsrooms. BUT, with the advent of the internet, cable, etc. the eyes of the multitudes have been opened to other points of view. Thank God!


20 posted on 12/09/2005 12:04:25 PM PST by Polyxene (For where God built a church, there the Devil would also build a chapel - Martin Luther)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson