Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
To: billorites
Where is the mandatory pic of the squirrel testes?
2 posted on
12/09/2005 7:02:40 AM PST by
dinoparty
(In the beginning was the Word)
To: billorites
1...2...3 testes, testes, testes. Is this thing on?
3 posted on
12/09/2005 7:02:52 AM PST by
cripplecreek
(Never a minigun handy when you need one.)
To: billorites
This probably explains why Janet Reno is dumber than a bag of rocks.
4 posted on
12/09/2005 7:03:17 AM PST by
Alberta's Child
(What it all boils down to is that no one's really got it figured out just yet.)
To: billorites
Oh, this should be good. Our Friday fun thread???
5 posted on
12/09/2005 7:04:43 AM PST by
mlc9852
To: billorites
I notice that although they equate brain size with intelligence, they do not note that men tend to have larger brains than women.
8 posted on
12/09/2005 7:05:58 AM PST by
marktwain
To: billorites
To: billorites
One, who came up with this theory and under what level of inebriated condition?
Two, who could possibly write the request for government funding for this study with a straight face?
To: billorites
Dammit! Was not IBTS (in before the squirrel)
15 posted on
12/09/2005 7:11:59 AM PST by
add925
To: billorites
18 posted on
12/09/2005 7:15:14 AM PST by
Dallas59
(“You love life, while we love death"( Al-Qaeda & Democratic Party)
To: billorites
19 posted on
12/09/2005 7:15:48 AM PST by
savedbygrace
(SECURE THE BORDERS FIRST (I'M YELLING ON PURPOSE))
To: billorites
Maybe this will put a stop to G. Gordon Liddy's bragging about his "grapefruit sized" nuts.
To: billorites
Greater promiscuity in females does, indeed, lead to bigger testes, It is crap like this that I have very little faith in studies. Their may be a relationship between promiscuity and testes but to claim a reason is pure speculation. For example, the opposite might be true. Female promiscuity might be the result of larger testes.
22 posted on
12/09/2005 7:19:14 AM PST by
Raycpa
To: billorites
How'd you like to be a lab assistant on that study?
23 posted on
12/09/2005 7:21:06 AM PST by
RichInOC
("...okay, turn your head and cough." *squeak!*)
To: billorites
They call me "Raisinettes."
24 posted on
12/09/2005 7:21:48 AM PST by
manic4organic
(We won. Get over it.)
To: billorites
What a waste of money. They could have come to the same conclusion by looking at the new TV season.
To: billorites
Brain and testicular size do not correlate with function, though further generalization becomes invalid.
As for the alleged inverse proportionality of brain and testicular function--I hate to brag but--I am the example that disproves both the aphorism and the results of this experiment (not to mention the invalidity of generalizations).
26 posted on
12/09/2005 7:40:13 AM PST by
Savage Beast
("Oprah: The light that shines so gently on those who need it most." ~Sidney Poitier)
To: billorites
no wonder I couldn't pass the Bar Exam the first time.
29 posted on
12/09/2005 8:08:39 AM PST by
jw777
To: billorites
The colder it gets, the smarter I get.....
31 posted on
12/09/2005 8:35:24 AM PST by
RightResponse
(What if the Left, just got up and .....)
To: billorites
Explains the Republicans in Congress I guess.
To: billorites
But if this were true, wouldn't the average Republican Senator have a head the size of '72 El Dorado?
39 posted on
12/09/2005 4:54:46 PM PST by
Redcloak
(We'll raise up our glasses against evil forces singin' "whiskey for my men and beer for my horses!")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
