Every one of those references is peer-reviewed, unlike your BS.
So now peer review means its authoritative? LMAO. Then why all the criticism of articles I have posted in the past? So do the handful (many badly misinterpreted I might add) peer-reviewed articles cited on junkscience outweigh the THOUSANDS of peer-reviewed articles that contradict what junkscience is saying?
Your hypocrisy is blatant. Sound science is only that which fulfills your worldview- everything else is a big conspiracy.