Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WHAT HAPPENED TO PAUL MIRECKI? (Phony Hate Crime Alert)
Michelle Malkin ^ | December 7, 2005 | Michelle Malkin

Posted on 12/08/2005 8:26:48 AM PST by PJ-Comix

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 201-205 next last
To: Right Wing Professor
> "SOMA is a group of skeptics and atheists": I suppose it depends about which one is skeptical. If this whole Mirecki incident is any indication, it is not the Atheists or Agnostics that are skeptical about anything.

SOMA is a student group for which Mirecki is faculty advisor. Apparently they quite like him. So I'd expect they would tend to take him at his word. I tend to take my friends at their word too.

I said nothing about SOMA itself.

121 posted on 12/08/2005 3:34:16 PM PST by AmishDude (Your corporate slogan could be here! FReepmail me for my confiscatory rates.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: Right Wing Professor

I respect your opinion on this, but just speaking for myself I generally ignore the types of posts you mentioned. Silence doesn't mean I approve of the content of those posts.


#####Yes, fundamentalists are often stupid bastards. Atheists are sometimes - I wouldn't say often - stupid bastards too.#####


My agreement or disagreement would depend on which fundamentalists you're talking about. Christians, Moslems, Jews, Buddhists, and Atheists can all be fundamentalists, as can members of countless other groups.


122 posted on 12/08/2005 3:36:05 PM PST by puroresu (Conservatism is an observation; Liberalism is an ideology)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: Right Wing Professor

The thread went from 12/05 and 11:30 AM to 12/8 at 10 AM. A three day long, 752 post thread. Of course people are going to miss stuff and not have time to reply to *everything* they see. Sure this stuff is uncalled for but to make a blanket condemnation of one group of people because the response they made (or didn't make) isn't what you thought they should be making is uncalled for also. Besides , it looked like you guys had the matter of condemning them pretty well under control. People who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones. What happened verbally to many of the Christians on that thread was not much different from the alleged beating the Professor got.


123 posted on 12/08/2005 3:37:27 PM PST by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: metmom

I wouldn't compare any verbal retorts, no matter how vicious, to physical violence.


124 posted on 12/08/2005 3:40:09 PM PST by AmishDude (Your corporate slogan could be here! FReepmail me for my confiscatory rates.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude
I've noted that you and your compatriots have a very hard time with sarcasm and irony. If I may comment, Publius6961's post was either sarcasm or irony, it's a bit hard to distinguish

Looks like crude humor, all right, but one sympathetic to the idea of beating the crap out of Mirecki.

F.J. Mitchell's was in bad taste but intended to be a bad joke

I'm so glad you can read his mind, because further down the thread he posted even more violent sentiments.

I note you quoted LK44-40. Well this is pretty low of you. First, the post was pulled.

It was there a long time. Evidently management wised up, as they did with kimosabe31's post 461. But why do you think the mods belatedly taking down a few of the many hateful posts in that thread is of any relevance?

Do I have to spell out what that means or did you figure it out on your own?

Why don't you spell it out?

125 posted on 12/08/2005 3:40:47 PM PST by Right Wing Professor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: metmom

There was an orgy of yee-haw humor going on about the incident. It was the main theme of the thread.


126 posted on 12/08/2005 3:41:52 PM PST by Right Wing Professor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: Right Wing Professor
Why don't you spell it out?

*Sigh*.

Troll. It was pretty clear by the over-the-top language, besides the recent sign-up date. Anybody can sign up and post anything.

127 posted on 12/08/2005 3:42:43 PM PST by AmishDude (Your corporate slogan could be here! FReepmail me for my confiscatory rates.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude

As a man thinks in his heart, so is he. The reason that Jesus said that our thoughts are equivalent to our actions is that it's just a matter of the amount of self control a person has to act on them or not. You watch a bunch of kids yelling at each other and it usually results in a physical confrontation. I don't condone physical violence unless it's a matter of self defense or protecting another but words can cut deeper and more painfully than physical injuries. Long after the physical cuts and bruises heal, the words will come back to haunt someone.


128 posted on 12/08/2005 3:49:26 PM PST by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude
Troll. It was pretty clear by the over-the-top language, besides the recent sign-up date. Anybody can sign up and post anything.

It's possible, I suppose.

129 posted on 12/08/2005 4:09:17 PM PST by Right Wing Professor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude
I wouldn't compare any verbal retorts, no matter how vicious, to physical violence.

We agree on that, at least. Equating words with violence is McKinnonesque.

130 posted on 12/08/2005 4:10:19 PM PST by Right Wing Professor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: metmom
Although harsh words indicate a spiritual degeneration or weakness on the part of the speaker or writer, their damage to the target is hardly comparable. So, when you speak or write in a vicious manner, it is your weakness and you should take ownership for it and realize what it means about your character and behavior. But if someone speaks harshly to you, you need to recognize the dark place from which those words come, forgive it and move on.

There are other things to deal with, when you talk about physical injuries.

131 posted on 12/08/2005 4:39:20 PM PST by AmishDude (Your corporate slogan could be here! FReepmail me for my confiscatory rates.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix

Lawrence, KS - University of Kansas religion professor Paul Mirecki, whose planned course on creationism was canceled after he described Christian students as "redneck Taliban fucktards who belong in formaldehyde, not in classrooms," was released today from a Lawrence hospital after an attack by a mysterious gang of Nascar racers.

According to Mirecki, he was driving his car at 3 AM on the outskirts of town when "20 or 30" Nascar race car pickup trucks suddenly appeared in a local WalMart parking lot and began following him menacingly, blaring AM talk radio. He says they ran him into a ditch, and began beating him with bibles, banjos and moonshine jars marked with 'XXX.'

"'This here's MERIKUH, and wee's all Jezus lovin' USA MER'KINS, yew gol-durn trickifyin' commernist smartypants! Stop challingin' our traditional backwoods bible valewz and tax cuts with yer dirty college book-larnin'!'" Mirecki quoted one of the assailants as saying. Mirecki said another threatened to "'shut up that thar purty professerin' mouth o' yers, lessen yew stop perluti-fyin' our Kansas hillbilly yunguns withen yore Satan monkey theories.'"

Mirecki was released from the hospital after treatment for minor bruises on his right cheekbone and fist.

Lawrence Police spokesman Carl Baher said that identifing the assailants would be difficult because, according to Mirecki, they were wearing Klan hoods and Sean Hannity masks. Nevertheless, Baher said his department would pursue all leads in the incident, the first recorded Nascar-related hate crime to occur in this quiet university town in more than 120 years.

"We are asking the Lawrence and KU community to aid in the investigation," said Baher. "Please report all sitings of white hillbilly Nazi plutocrats driving loud race pickups with large Halliburton or Enron decals."

(from IowaHawk)


132 posted on 12/08/2005 5:16:00 PM PST by FormerACLUmember
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Right Wing Professor

Why do you think so many people stayed off of it then? The thread deteriorated rather quickly. I didn't see the point or have the inclination to be part of it. My posting on FR is on my terms, I will pick and choose which ones I respond to and I won't be baited into participating in one like that; and that's what it seemed like was going on with all the accusations of "Your silence is condoning the violence." People can make all the speculations and conjecture about my motives that they want and it won't change my mind.


133 posted on 12/08/2005 5:37:56 PM PST by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: Right Wing Professor

Probable more than possible. What better way to give Christians a bad name than by posing as one and being a real jerk? The problem is that there is no way of stopping it from happening. Most people I know that are serious about their faith are not like that. If someone claims to be a Christian and acts like that, I just consider that they're not and move on. Talk is cheap. If their lives do not match up to what they profess, then they are frauds. But just because people are hypocrites or weak, doesn't invalidate the message of the gospel. That is true even if people aren't.


134 posted on 12/08/2005 5:46:29 PM PST by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: Right Wing Professor
Regardless of what did or did not happen to Mirecki, the vileness posted, and allowed to remain posted, here on FR says a lot.

Doesn't hold a candle to those of your peers on the evo threads.

135 posted on 12/08/2005 5:48:26 PM PST by Hacksaw (The liberal wants to control what you do, the atheist wants to control what you think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Fester Chugabrew
Actually, this is the highly sought after photo of the Grand Master, and all his acolytes have adopted the same look:


136 posted on 12/08/2005 5:58:54 PM PST by Tench_Coxe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Tench_Coxe

LOL! My picture was before the Grand Master evolved. Alas, however, even Sponge Bob Square Pants didn't want to be associated with the Mirecki name.


137 posted on 12/08/2005 6:11:05 PM PST by Fester Chugabrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: Right Wing Professor
You've been in academia too long, and you're rearranging facts to suit what you already think. The guy resigned his chairmanship after the supposed beating. It was obvious to anyone who's ever worked emergency services that his story was suspect. He didn't resign over criticism, he resigned because he may be getting ready to face criminal charges. The people who supposedly pulled him over were stereotypes, kind of like the black guys with sweatshirts that mug the guy who lost his paycheck playing poker. He wasn't sure where it happened. Yeah, right. Two rednecks in a pickup are following an academic disagreement at the local University about course subject matter so closely that they recognized the guy in his car. You betcha. Finally, you've got two guys who are willing to commit a felony, and after they pull the guy over, they just slap him around a little. Two guys willing to do that would have beaten him unconscious, pulled his clothes off of him, and run his car off an embankment. He'd have been out there naked, semiconscious, with at least some broken ribs, a broken nose, missing teeth, and no way to get anywhere. Guys who do stuff like this don't mess around. The story stinks to high heaven, and the police know he's lying. That's why he's out of the chairmanship, and if there's any justice, he'll be out of a job. Think about it. The guy created a story out of whole cloth to reinforce his position. That's not a person who should be teaching in a college.
138 posted on 12/08/2005 6:27:24 PM PST by Richard Kimball (Tenure is the enemy of excellence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: metmom
Oh, this demand for "signing on" to disapproval of certain postings is a Control Thing. Like all these rules they seem to make up for Free Republic.

They just want to keep you busy, rhetoric-wise, "apologizing" for some stray comment they pretend to think is out of line. It's a Democrat tactic--like apologizing for the Civil War because you're white or from the South. Let 'em "ignore". Notice they don't reciprocate with all this bowing and apologizing, btw, when one of their fellows makes a perfect idiot of himself.

If there are fellows, rather than fellow.

139 posted on 12/08/2005 6:50:19 PM PST by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: Hacksaw
re: Doesn't hold a candle to those of your peers on the evo threads.)))

And observe the "gangup" habits of these evo-posters (how can they do it in such a timely fashion if they're not connected by IM?)--they isolate a freeper and pile on. Talk about your vile--that's just plain bullying.

Then, when the hoped-for event happens, and the freeper loses his temper, they go screaming and hassling the mods. How infantile.

And inventing rules. Remember that kid you used to play a game with, except he was that jerk who wanted to change the game with all these made-up rules?

"You can't talk to me."

Say, what?

"I've put you on Virtual Ignore, and I'll tell if you post to me."

Good grief, Scientist Sandbox, king of the playground...

Only, what if it's not just an online engagement for those restless sorts (like me), who enjoy a good argument?

What if the whole idea is to chip off support for the GOP of the religious conservatives? It wouldn't take many to turn an election in a battleground state--say, like Pennsylvania?

140 posted on 12/08/2005 7:04:36 PM PST by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 201-205 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson