Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

UAW Fuels Logjam on House Pension Bill
THE WALL STREET JOURNAL ^ | December 8, 2005 | MICHAEL SCHROEDER

Posted on 12/08/2005 5:26:36 AM PST by Brilliant

The United Auto Workers union, with ...backing from General Motors Corp., has stymied efforts... to pass legislation on the government insurance fund for corporate pensions.

After two years of debate -- and recent maneuvering that seemed to produce a compromise -- Republican sponsors of the House bill are becoming resigned to postponing action until next year...

Lawmakers' difficulty in passing a bill backed by the White House and, lately, many large companies, reflects the tension in pension legislation. Politicians want to shore up the federal pension insurance agency so taxpayers don't have to bail it out, as they did the savings and loan industry in the 1990s. But that means forcing companies to put more money behind pension promises...

The legislative logjam is complicated by efforts of auto unions and auto company managers to stop legislation...

The Bush administration is pushing for legislation to force companies whose defined-benefit plans are insured by the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. to make substantially larger contributions to their retirement plans. The PBGC, which collects premiums from participating companies, insures those benefits, and a rash of bankruptcies by steel, airline and auto industry companies has pushed the agency into the red. The PBGC recently reported long-term liabilities exceed its assets by $22.8 billion as of Sept. 30...

Without congressional action, the formula companies use to calculate payments they must make to pension plans expires on Dec. 31, and companies will have to put in much more money when the next quarterly payment is due on April 15...

Democratic lawmakers, encouraged by unions, have been reluctant to sign on to a compromise, arguing the cure could be worse than the ailment...

(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: 109th; automakers; generalmotors; gm; pbgc; pensions; uaw; unions
First the Dems doom social security. Now they want to doom our pensions.
1 posted on 12/08/2005 5:26:37 AM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

This link goes to a subscription site. What's the union angle on this - why wouldn't they want companies to cough up more dough?


2 posted on 12/08/2005 5:35:19 AM PST by gotribe (Hillary: Accessory to Rape)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gotribe

Mainly because the auto companies are already on the verge of bankruptcy, and putting an additional burden on them both pushes them further to the brink, and makes it more difficult for the unions to extract concessions from them.


Besides, they don't benefit if GM puts money into the pensions anyway. The PBGC will make up the shortfall with taxpayer money if GM's pension funding is inadequate.


3 posted on 12/08/2005 5:38:43 AM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
The PBGC will make up the shortfall with taxpayer money if GM's pension funding is inadequate.

Yes and no. PBGC will not pay the full pension amount. Workers take a big reduciton. Except the bigwigs, of course, whose full pension amount is guaranteed.

4 posted on 12/08/2005 5:45:21 AM PST by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: gotribe
What's the union angle on this - why wouldn't they want companies to cough up more dough?

From the article:

Without congressional action, the formula companies use to calculate payments they must make to pension plans expires on Dec. 31, and companies will have to put in much more money when the next quarterly payment is due on April 15...

Killing the compromise means companies have to cough up more cash to fund their pensions than they would have to under the proposed legislation.

5 posted on 12/08/2005 5:54:12 AM PST by tx_eggman (If we had some bacon we could have bacon and eggs ... if we had some eggs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson