Skip to comments.
Hecklers Cause Coulter to Cut UConn Speech
AP ^
| 12/7/5
| SHELLEY K. WONG
Posted on 12/07/2005 8:32:41 PM PST by SmithL
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-105 last
To: CheyennePress
Sarcasm assumes a reliance upon logic. That is, one makes logical statements illogical and by doing so, expects others to follow along. Libs, on the other hand, rely on their own emotions a lot more, and we all know that sarcasm and appeals to the emotion just don't mix. That alone makes them sound pretentious.
That's so true...the liberals in my work and social circles are astonishingly bad at sarcasm. There is no humor in it because the words come out with anger. And if they 'talk like a conservative' in jest, it gives me the opportunity to praise their conversion. Being liberals, they cannot laugh at that, and get all red and quite mad!
101
posted on
12/08/2005 3:01:06 PM PST
by
LostInBayport
(Massachusetts liberals refuse to admit we exist...we are the 37% of MA voters who voted for GWB)
To: Wallace T.
Colleges, especially state-run colleges, should be compelled to provide security sufficient to protect campus speakers and vigorously prosecute disrupters. Conservative legal advocacy groups need to take colleges like the University of Connecticut, to court for failure to protect the First Amendment rights of Ann Coulter and those who wanted to hear what she had to say. University administrators may not want to protect the freedom of speech for conservatives, but they fear expensive lawsuits. In addition; here's an interesting idea from another thread...
It's time to enact laws pointed directly at people who threaten democracy.
I would like to see a Federal law that would pull funding from any university that do not take effective measures to prevent disruption in classrooms and at speeches by invited speakers.
That, alone, would ensure that conservatives have a chance to be heard on campus, and put sanctions on those who interfere.
102
posted on
12/08/2005 6:33:16 PM PST
by
who knows what evil?
(New England...the Sodom and Gomorrah of the 21st Century, and they're proud of it!)
To: M1Tanker
I should have pointed out that I was being sarcastic. I understand clearly the double standard to which liberals live by.
103
posted on
12/09/2005 6:51:16 PM PST
by
This Just In
("Those are my principles, if you don't like them, I've got others" - Groucho Marx)
To: This Just In
I guessed as much. Sarcasm is difficult with the written word. I was just trying to cover many of the points made by various people. But then, when I try to be sarcastic, sometimes my humor and desert sand have a lot in common so no complaints here.
104
posted on
12/09/2005 9:34:54 PM PST
by
M1Tanker
(Proven Daily: Modern "progressive" liberalism is just National Socialism without the "twisted cross")
To: SmithL
They criticized her for spreading a message of hate and intolerance. As they spread their message of hate and intolerance.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-105 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson