Replies

If the counting I did was accurate, hopefully, then the answer is there is very little evidence against what I heard judging from these 4 provinces. Manitoba actually has more seats than they should apparently.

A grandfather clause carried over from the old British North America Act guarantees each province the same number of seats they originally received upon admittance into the Dominion and on that base every province gets new seats in keeping with population growth. (Although Quebec has not added new seats in a couple of decades - that number remains at 75.) The number of seats keeps growing with every federal census so unlike in the United States, no province can lose seats because the size of the House Of Commons isn't fixed at arbitrary number by law. As of the 2001 Census, there are 308 members in the HOC, though that number will go up again after 2011.

(Denny Crane: "I Don't Want To Socialize With A Pinko Liberal Democrat Commie.Say What You Like About Republicans. We Stick To Our Convictions. Even When We Know We're Dead Wrong.")

Provinces with low populations, and Quebec, are overrepresented. This means that Quebec, the Maritime Provinces, and Saskatchewan and Manitoba have fewer voters per rep, while Ontario, Alberta, and B.C. have more voters per rep.

I'm not sure if Quebec is still as overrepresented as it used to be. Someone else posted some numbers above. Since Ontario is the heartland of the Liberals and Alberta the base for the Conservatives, while the Maritimes and the other Prairies swing back and forth among the different groups, the partisan effect is probably a wash.