Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DebtAndDelusion; Alter Kaker
Now Mr Kaker you say if you had held that ounce of gold since 1900 you would have lost a lot of money. I don't know how I've made it all these years but I know you are wrong on that account.

Turning $20 in gold in 1900 into $517 in gold in 2005 only requires a 3.14% annual rate of return. I know of a few investments that have done better since 1900.

24 posted on 12/07/2005 11:37:41 AM PST by Toddsterpatriot (The Federal Reserve did not kill JFK. Greenspan was not on the grassy knoll.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: Toddsterpatriot

That's easy to say in hindsight. Tell us, what will do better than gold over the next 100 years?


32 posted on 12/07/2005 12:15:50 PM PST by coloradan (Failing to protect the liberties of your enemies establishes precedents that will reach to yourself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: Toddsterpatriot
Turning $20 in gold in 1900 into $517 in gold in 2005 only requires a 3.14% annual rate of return. I know of a few investments that have done better since 1900.

Meanwhile, the S & P 500 and the DJIA has returned an average of something like 10.3% since the inception of those indexes back in the 1920's. Yep, gold is a really great investment and hedge against inflation.

50 posted on 12/07/2005 2:55:31 PM PST by Labyrinthos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson