Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S.(BOLTON!)angry Algeria blocking statement condemning Islamic Jihad for Israeli suicide bombing
Asharq Alawsat ^ | 07/12/2005

Posted on 12/07/2005 8:32:09 AM PST by Ooh-Ah

UNITED NATIONS (AP) - U.S. Ambassador John Bolton criticized Algeria for blocking a U.N. Security Council statement blaming Islamic Jihad for a suicide bombing in Israel and urging Syria to shut the militant group's offices in Damascus.

Algeria's U.N. Ambassador Abdallah Baali accused the American envoy of being "totally inaccurate and unfair."

It was a rare outburst by Bolton against a fellow member of the Security Council, and drew a strong rebuke from Baali who complained Tuesday that the American envoy's "take it or leave it" approach went against the council's give-and-take tradition of doing business.

Bolton said the United States had drafted a statement for the Security Council to adopt on Monday's suicide bombing in the coastal city of Netanya which killed five Israelis and injured more than 35 others. It was the fifth since Israel and the Palestinians forged a cease-fire in February and Islamic Jihad has claimed responsibility for all of them, saying its attacks are in response to Israeli violations of the truce.

The draft U.S. press statement "unequivocally" condemned the terrorist attack, denounced all acts of terrorism and urged all parties to exercise restraint. It urged the Syrian government to take immediate action to close the offices of Palestinian Islamic Jihad and "prevent the use of its territory by armed groups engaged in terrorist acts," and support progress on the so-called road map to Middle East peace.

Bolton said "Algeria objected to the reference to Syria and to the reference to Palestinian Islamic Jihad" even though the group claimed responsibility for the attack and the Palestinians said the orders came from Damascus.

"We are simply not going to accept watering down of Security Council press statements, and failing to name the names of the people responsible, in this case for terrorist attacks," he said.

Bolton said there was "nothing left to negotiate" so he decided to act alone and read the statement to reporters on behalf of the United States.

Baali strongly disagreed with Bolton, saying the United States wanted the text adopted without any discussion. When Algeria, Russia and others proposed amendments and asked for a meeting of council experts to discuss the draft, he said, the United States withdrew it.

"I think the attitude of the United States is take it or leave it," Baali said. He said Bolton's claim that Algeria opposed references to Syria and Islamic Jihad were "not true."

"We didn't even have the opportunity to discuss it," Baali said. "We had no chance to express our views, and I am confident if we had had such a meeting we would have been able to come up with a balanced text. This is the way the Security Council ... has always functioned."

The U.S. stand that "you take it or you leave it is not helping the Security Council, and is not helping the cause of peace in the Middle East," he said.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: ambassadorbolton; bolton; terrorism; un
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

1 posted on 12/07/2005 8:32:10 AM PST by Ooh-Ah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Ooh-Ah

"went against the council's give-and-take tradition of doing business"

Meaning, went against the council's determination never to say anything critical of the terrorists, and never to say anything which might remotely be construed to be in Israel's favor.


2 posted on 12/07/2005 8:33:34 AM PST by CondorFlight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ooh-Ah

This is rich. The terrorists and their allies the American DemocRAT party are gonna get steamrolled by Bolton. America doesn't have to take this garbage anymore. Time to take out the trash: the Eurotrash, the african trash, the fascist trash.


3 posted on 12/07/2005 8:34:33 AM PST by mallardx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ooh-Ah

"It was a rare outburst by Bolton against a fellow member of the Security Council, and drew a strong rebuke from Baali who complained Tuesday that the American envoy's 'take it or leave it' approach went against the council's give-and-take tradition of doing business."

Yeah - we give, they take.


4 posted on 12/07/2005 8:34:40 AM PST by Caveman Lawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ooh-Ah

I think it is getting pretty obvious. Use the same tactics that the Republicans used against the democrats. Demand an up or down vote in the UN either condemning terrorism or supporting it. Cut relations with any country not condemning it and declare them enemies in the war on terror.


5 posted on 12/07/2005 8:37:07 AM PST by Bob Buchholz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ooh-Ah
"We had no chance to express our views, and I am confident if we had had such a meeting we would have been able to come up with a balanced text. This is the way the Security Council ... has always functioned."

A new sheriff in town boys!

On another thread someone said "wish we could clone Bolton". I agree!

6 posted on 12/07/2005 8:37:20 AM PST by ScaniaBoy (Part of the Right Wing Research & Attack Machine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ooh-Ah

The UN should start to realize the Honeymoon Period is over and Bolton is in charge.


7 posted on 12/07/2005 8:41:45 AM PST by tobyhill (The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ooh-Ah

"I think the attitude of the United States is take it or leave it,"

Yeah cold blooded murder of innocents, yeah guess we are kinda sensitive about that.... we americans are just so narrow minded. /sarcasm


8 posted on 12/07/2005 8:43:21 AM PST by Walkingfeather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ooh-Ah

> ... the American envoy's "take it or leave it" approach
> went against the council's give-and-take tradition of
> doing business.

The days of "business as usual" are over at the UN, but
some of the perps don't yet realize it.


9 posted on 12/07/2005 8:46:21 AM PST by Boundless
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boundless

Yep they have no idea how much has changed since 9/11.


10 posted on 12/07/2005 8:50:54 AM PST by MARKUSPRIME
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Ooh-Ah

11 posted on 12/07/2005 8:52:49 AM PST by blackie (Be Well~Be Armed~Be Safe~Molon Labe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ooh-Ah

Syria allows terrorists to operate out of their country and its not even below ground? I mean, they let Islamic Jihad have offices that they, and the rest of the world know about and Syria hasn't been invaded yet? WTF is going on?


12 posted on 12/07/2005 8:55:38 AM PST by NLB2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ooh-Ah

Give 'em hell John!


13 posted on 12/07/2005 8:55:53 AM PST by RAY (John Roberts, Chief Justice, The U.S. Supreme Court -- good move!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MARKUSPRIME

This may have given them all the idea that the old ways of doing things at the U.N. are gone, and we will play for "keeps" from now on. Forget the namby-pamby ways of yesteryear, and get ready for in-your-face diplomacy. I hope Amb. Bolton tears them a "new one", kicks ass, and takes names. They are long overdue, and it's about time to play hardball with these feckless wonders at the U.N.


14 posted on 12/07/2005 8:58:15 AM PST by geezerwheezer (get up boys, we're burnin' daylight!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Ooh-Ah
What should have been said: "Ambassador Abdallah Baali, what part of 'you're with US, or you're with the terrorists', did you not understand? If you'd like, we could send some Marines to Algeria to explain it to you in terms you'd better understand."
15 posted on 12/07/2005 8:58:41 AM PST by PsyOp (The commonwealth is theirs who hold the arms.... - Aristotle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ooh-Ah
....the American envoy's "take it or leave it" approach went against the council's give-and-take tradition of doing business.

There is absolutely NO compromise in calling it exactly what it is. Murder is murder and if fanatic islamites don't want the truth of their nasty laundry aired all over, they'd best change their wardrobe.

16 posted on 12/07/2005 8:59:25 AM PST by azhenfud (He who always is looking up seldom finds others' lost change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ooh-Ah
Bolton said "Algeria objected to the reference to Syria and to the reference to Palestinian Islamic Jihad" even though the group claimed responsibility for the attack and the Palestinians said the orders came from Damascus.

Algeria's U.N. Ambassador Abdallah Baali accused the American envoy of being "totally inaccurate and unfair."

Which parts, exactly?

Only in the Alice-in-Wonderland world of the United Nations, can two starkly impossibly contradictory statements be discussed seriously, and with a straight face.

17 posted on 12/07/2005 9:04:51 AM PST by Publius6961 (The IQ of California voters is about 420........... .............cumulatively)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ooh-Ah

Wasn't Algeria the home of the PLO?

Mark


18 posted on 12/07/2005 9:06:32 AM PST by MarkL (When Kaylee says "No power in the `verse can stop me," it's cute. When River says it, it's scary!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MarkL

I think you mean Tunis, Tunisia.


19 posted on 12/07/2005 9:39:55 AM PST by Piranha
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Ooh-Ah

It's a meaningless piece of paper, why get all excited?


20 posted on 12/07/2005 9:47:04 AM PST by Realism (Some believe that the facts-of-life are open to debate.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson