Posted on 12/07/2005 8:32:09 AM PST by Ooh-Ah
"went against the council's give-and-take tradition of doing business"
Meaning, went against the council's determination never to say anything critical of the terrorists, and never to say anything which might remotely be construed to be in Israel's favor.
This is rich. The terrorists and their allies the American DemocRAT party are gonna get steamrolled by Bolton. America doesn't have to take this garbage anymore. Time to take out the trash: the Eurotrash, the african trash, the fascist trash.
"It was a rare outburst by Bolton against a fellow member of the Security Council, and drew a strong rebuke from Baali who complained Tuesday that the American envoy's 'take it or leave it' approach went against the council's give-and-take tradition of doing business."
Yeah - we give, they take.
I think it is getting pretty obvious. Use the same tactics that the Republicans used against the democrats. Demand an up or down vote in the UN either condemning terrorism or supporting it. Cut relations with any country not condemning it and declare them enemies in the war on terror.
A new sheriff in town boys!
On another thread someone said "wish we could clone Bolton". I agree!
The UN should start to realize the Honeymoon Period is over and Bolton is in charge.
"I think the attitude of the United States is take it or leave it,"
Yeah cold blooded murder of innocents, yeah guess we are kinda sensitive about that.... we americans are just so narrow minded. /sarcasm
> ... the American envoy's "take it or leave it" approach
> went against the council's give-and-take tradition of
> doing business.
The days of "business as usual" are over at the UN, but
some of the perps don't yet realize it.
Yep they have no idea how much has changed since 9/11.
Syria allows terrorists to operate out of their country and its not even below ground? I mean, they let Islamic Jihad have offices that they, and the rest of the world know about and Syria hasn't been invaded yet? WTF is going on?
Give 'em hell John!
This may have given them all the idea that the old ways of doing things at the U.N. are gone, and we will play for "keeps" from now on. Forget the namby-pamby ways of yesteryear, and get ready for in-your-face diplomacy. I hope Amb. Bolton tears them a "new one", kicks ass, and takes names. They are long overdue, and it's about time to play hardball with these feckless wonders at the U.N.
There is absolutely NO compromise in calling it exactly what it is. Murder is murder and if fanatic islamites don't want the truth of their nasty laundry aired all over, they'd best change their wardrobe.
Algeria's U.N. Ambassador Abdallah Baali accused the American envoy of being "totally inaccurate and unfair."
Which parts, exactly?
Only in the Alice-in-Wonderland world of the United Nations, can two starkly impossibly contradictory statements be discussed seriously, and with a straight face.
Wasn't Algeria the home of the PLO?
Mark
I think you mean Tunis, Tunisia.
It's a meaningless piece of paper, why get all excited?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.