Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ARCADIA
Your ...

" ...He should have appreciated that we had a large number of assets assigned to his command, and he should have used some of them to establish adequate pickets and responses."

neglects some specific facts.

For example, during 1941 fully a third of the Pacific Fleet was transferred to the Atlantic to support the convoying of Lend-Lease war materiels - these included the majority of Fleet's oilers. In this same period, over 200 PBYs also went to the USSR, again under Lead-Lease, while Pearl Harbor got very few and even less spare parts, ..., etc.

For more details on the types/numbers of "assets" and their fighting capacity - see Gannon's "Pearl Harbor Betrayed" from 2001.

24 posted on 12/07/2005 6:45:08 AM PST by jamaksin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: jamaksin
neglects some specific facts.

None of which could have been remedied on November 25th, in time to stop the December 7th attack. But, there were still many protective steps which were not taken, and Kimmel was responsible for the posture of his command.
29 posted on 12/07/2005 6:59:08 AM PST by ARCADIA (Abuse of power comes as no surprise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson