[Dimensio]

Uh huh. You're doing the DU now.

I went back and looked at my own statement. I said "many". I specifically chose the word "many" because I am aware that my statement does not apply to "all" creationists. Had I intended for my statement to refer to all creationists I would have worded it such. But, because you are amongst the "many" you have decided to deliberately lie about my statement because facts and reality are anathema to you. Honestly, I'm not surprised; this isn't the first time where a creationist has dishonestly claimed that I intended a statement that I specifically worded as non-universal is in fact a "blanket" claim.

Perhaps you should debate like a man, rather than a coward.

I wasn't aware that it was an act of cowardice to point out that you are lying about my statement. Then again, "many" creationists seem to have different definitions for "lying" and "coward" than everyone else.

[Dimensio]

Honestly, I'm not surprised; this isn't the first time where a creationist has dishonestly claimed that I intended a statement that I specifically worded as non-universal is in fact a "blanket" claim.

Now that's just poorly phrased. "...this isn't the first time where a creationist has dishonestly claimed that I intended a statement specifically worded as non-universal as a "blanket" claim."

That's a more grammatically coherent way of putting it.