Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Petronski
Five years is not just a random number in this case, it's also a best-case scenario. Run it from 10 or 20 years.

The S&P 500 has been showing positive returns for the past 3 years. In the past year Gold has outperformed the S&P 500 by 4.2%. With an average 1.7% dividend yield on the S&P 500 stocks which had a better TOTAL return?

Gold = Green         S&P 500 = Blue

For the past two years Gold has outperformed the S&P 500 by 6%. With average dividend yield of 1.8% for the first year and 1.7% the second year on the S&P 500 stocks, which has a better TOTAL return?

Gold = Green         S&P 500 = Blue

For the past 3 years Gold has outperformed the S&P 500 by 13.4%. With an average dividend yield on the S&P 500 stocks of 2% the first year, 1.8% the second year, and 1.7% the third year, which had a better return?

Gold = Green         S&P 500 = Blue

If you invested $10,000 in Gold or the S&P 500 three years ago with dividends on the S&P 500 stocks re-invested would you have more money with Gold or the S&P 500?

This is with Gold and the S&P 500 performing positive. It is not a worst case scenario for the S&P 500 (2000) or Gold (1980). It is the recent past. You may LOL or throw a gold shill name around if you like but Gold has outperformed the S&P 500 the past 3 years.

124 posted on 12/07/2005 9:22:17 AM PST by simon says what
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies ]


To: simon says what
If you invested $10,000 in Gold or the S&P 500 twenty-five years ago with dividends on the S&P 500 stocks re-invested would you have more money with Gold or the S&P 500?
126 posted on 12/07/2005 9:27:02 AM PST by Petronski (I love Cyborg!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson