Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cinnamon Girl

I did not say that he was a U.S. hater.

I did say that he wanted to do a story critical of the Bush Administration's involvement in Iraq and Afganistan.

That was reported in the msm. According to them he wanted to interview locals and get their opinions.

Go back and look it up. I remember reading it.


92 posted on 12/07/2005 10:39:23 AM PST by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]


To: sport

He was in Karachi researching the network around shoe bomber Richard Reid and a vermin named Gilani tied to Osama bin Laden. The filthy vermin murdered him because to them he represented Bush and Sharon. Daniel Pearl may have personally been critical of the war, but he strove to be a balanced journalist.


96 posted on 12/07/2005 1:54:54 PM PST by Cinnamon Girl (OMGIIHIHOIIC ping list)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]

To: sport; Jeff Head; kinghorse
I found this on the Slate website, and I think it accurately explains what was going on:

There is an AP article that clarifies our new kidnapping policy. It turns out that the shift is this: The old policy said the United States could take absolutely no part in a ransom scheme, whereas the new policy has left the following loophole. If a company, like Dow Jones, for instance, wants to negotiate a ransom, the government can be involved in the effort.

98 posted on 12/07/2005 2:30:47 PM PST by Cinnamon Girl (OMGIIHIHOIIC ping list)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson