I concede your points. Yes, I too have a problem with the outcome of this trial. I would be very interested in hearing more about this trial and the jury.
I heard Steve Emerson's take on it (I trust his opinion). The evidence was "old" he said - alot of the material was from the mid 90s. Not that this should mean much legally, if there is a statute of limitations involved - so be it, that's the law. But apparently there was a feeling that this wasn't "fresh" evidence?
Well how about that - former KKK persons are convicted of lynchings in the south that occurred 20-30 years ago, but somehow this jury figures that unless you were in Islamic Jihad "last week", its old news and you get a pass. God help us.
the best news to come out of this - the new trial will involve a new jury.