To: YOUGOTIT
I agree as long as no one pays for any injuries sustained in an auto accident because you were being thrown about or out of the vehicle. If you dont wear your seatbelt, a law in most all states, then you have no claim for damages sustained while breaking the law.
Works for me...
25 posted on
12/06/2005 12:46:10 PM PST by
halfright
(3 Days post Hanoi (Jihadi) Jane... 2200hrs meeting to urinate on her grave...Semper Fi !)
To: halfright
Recent studies in Manitoba showed that the benefits of wearing seat-belts, especially for the front-seat passenger, are balanced by the increase in injuries to back-seat passengers and driver hip injuries.
Counter-intuitive, I know.
31 posted on
12/06/2005 12:59:02 PM PST by
headsonpikes
(The Liberal Party of Canada are not b*stards - b*stards have mothers!)
To: halfright
Works for me...
Only if you're a liberal. Ronald Reagan opposed mandatory helmet and seatbelt laws. He felt it was none of the governments business. As a Conservative, I have to agree with him.
.
39 posted on
12/06/2005 1:38:07 PM PST by
mugs99
(Don't take life too seriously, you won't get out alive.)
To: halfright
No, you aren't even half right.
41 posted on
12/06/2005 1:44:45 PM PST by
MileHi
( "It's coming down to patriots vs the politicians." - ovrtaxt)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson