Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cicero
Since, as you say, the law's is to be read in the way it would have been understood at the time, then it's perfectly appropriate to use conceptions of natural law as a guide to the text's interpretation. But that's different from saying that natural law should be used to supplement what's in the text. If the text just doesn't forbid something, it's not the job of a judge to rule against it because of its conflict with his interpretation of natural law.
27 posted on 12/07/2005 9:00:57 AM PST by inquest (If you favor any legal status for illegal aliens, then do not claim to be in favor of secure borders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: inquest

I don't think we really disagree on this. What you said earlier just raised some interesting issues.


28 posted on 12/07/2005 10:44:40 AM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson