Posted on 12/06/2005 9:59:38 AM PST by dennisw
It's an ancient name with contemporary - and controversial - significance. According to legend, Aztlan was the ancestral homeland of the Aztec people, a place believed by many to be located somewhere in the southwestern United States.
In Chicano folklore, the name was used to describe the part of Mexico taken over by the U.S. after the Mexican-American War of 1846. During the Chicano civil rights movement of the 1960s and '70s, Aztlan became a symbol of political nationalism and ethnic pride.
Today, Aztlan is still a word that evokes pride among Mexican-Americans. "Aztlan is a state of mind. It's a spiritual concept that was designed to give people a sense of belonging at a time when brown kids and other minorities were told they didn't belong," said David Marquez, a Chicano studies professor at Colorado State University-Pueblo.
But immigration reformers, both moderate and extreme, see a much darker meaning in the term. To them, Aztlan represents an insidious movement of radical Chicano nationalists and Mexicans seeking to reclaim much of the Southwest, including Colorado, for Mexico.
"Demographically, socially, and culturally, the reconquista (re-conquest) of the southwest United States is well under way," said Yeh Ling-Ling, executive director of the Diversity Alliance for a Sustainable America, a group that focuses on population control. She testified at an immigration hearing organized by the Republican Committee of Colorado at the state Capitol on Nov. 17.
In October, Rep. Jim Welker, R-Loveland, joined two state House colleagues on a trip to Arizona in preparation for a push in the upcoming Colorado legislative session to cut off state services to illegal immigrants. At a hearing with Arizona legislators he warned of "groups of people planning and having their own separate nation of Aztlan."
And on several immigration reform Web sites, Aztlan supporters are called a threat to the tighter-border campaign and even national security.
Americanpatrol.com says, "Those who scoff at the idea of a Mexican takeover of the southwestern United States don't understand history and they underestimate Mexicans."
But those speaking out against Aztlan are the ones who have misinterpreted history and distorted the meaning of the term, say Chicano activists and academics.
Aztlan re-emerged in the 1960s when one of the founders of the Chicano civil rights movement, Rodolfo "Corky" Gonzales of Denver, led a Chicano contingent in the Poor People's March on Washington, D.C.
There, he issued his "Plan of the Barrio," which called for better housing, education and business opportunities. He also proposed forming a Congress of Aztlan to achieve these goals.
The term Aztlan soon proliferated in Chicano culture, from Mexican folkloric dance groups to student organizations.
In March 1969, the Crusade for Justice, led by Gonzales, hosted the first National Chicano Liberation Youth Conference in Denver. The resolutions adopted by the conference were assembled in a document titled El Plan de Aztlan.
"It was a beautifully written proclamation of our identity and our worth as brown human beings," said Nita Gonzales, daughter of the late civil rights leader. "The actual plan talked about our need to create our own political foundation of power. We talked about housing and employment; combating the racism and discrimination that existed at that time."
The following month, the Chicano Coordinating Council on Higher Education held a conference at the University of California-Santa Barbara. The result was a master plan for the creation of a Chicano studies curriculum and related services to help Chicano students enroll in college.
That year, M.E.Ch.A. (Movimiento Estudiantil Chicano de Aztlan or Chicano Student Movement of Aztlan) was born. The student groups can now be found on almost every major high school, college and university campus throughout the western and southwestern United States.
According to the M.E.Ch.A. bylaws, it is "a multifunctional Chicana/o nationalist organization that concentrates on political, social, educational, and cultural issues that pertain to the Chicana/o community."
The organization assists in "the consciousness raising of our people and the retention of our culture to help give our on-campus community empowerment through awareness. On an individual level, M.E.Ch.A. fosters leadership skills, self and group respect, and more friendships with Raza (Chicano) students."
Those who denounce Aztlan as a separatist movement claim that they recruit their members from organizations such as M.E.Ch.A.
"M.E.Ch.A. is a Latino neo-Marxist organization with chapters supported by tax dollars and student funds," according to the Web site, FrontPageMagazine.com.
"They have been active in fighting the (1994 anti-immigrant measure) California referendum Prop 187, as well as seeking the abolition of the Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (formerly INS), and eliminating the border with Mexico entirely," the Web site claims.
Mikiel Ghelieh, a 22-year-old English major at CSU-Pueblo and a leader of the M.E.Ch.A chapter there, said his group stresses community involvement, not the takeover of the Southwest.
"We go to different schools and try to give young people a taste of student activism. We want to introduce them to the idea of getting involved and making a difference in their community," said Ghelieh.
This past semester, the Pueblo chapter focused most of its attention on a faculty member whose racially charged lecture last March on illegal immigration led some to call for his resignation.
"As for the 'threat' of Aztlan, it's the same thing it's always been: using fear to stir people up," he said.
Gonzales agrees.
"In the '60s and '70s, we absolutely talked about Aztlan as our own place. We were battling discrimination and being thought of as second-class citizens. M.E.Ch.A. and other organizations have been instrumental in maintaining that spirit of Aztlan," she said. "The way people are turning the meaning of Aztlan around to spread fear and hatred is wrong."
Vincent C. de Baca, chairman of the Chicano Studies Department at Metropolitan State College of Denver, calls Aztlan "a flame flickering in our hearts."
"As a symbol of political nationalism - that idea died on delivery, except for a few fringe elements that continue pushing their agenda," he said. "As a cultural symbol, it's alive and well, manifested in our dance, our music, our poetry and literature."
The true meaning of Aztlan will continue to play an important role for Chicanos coming of age. But it also remains a contentious concept in the debate over illegal immigration
ping
Mexico City and they're welcome to it.
However any use of Indian terminology for the names or mascots of sports teams is definitely an act of oppression and not one of pride.
So if the Mexicans in the SouthWest break away, will Nancy Pelosi lose her seat in Congress? Watch for lefties to change their tune on immigration in the near future.
So if the Mexicans in the SouthWest break away, will Nancy Pelosi lose her seat in Congress? Watch for lefties to change their tune on immigration in the near future.
There would be a bunch of Indian tribes in the SW thatb would have something to say about any Mexican "breakaway"
The Aztecs lived in CENTRAL MEXICO - not the SW
I see irony in that sentence!
Yeah, and in '58 we were told Castro and his boys were 'simple agrarian reformers'.
I think we're too smart to fall for this neo-Marxian disinformation.
Quite a few of the early Mechistas were evil spawn of Saul Alinskey.
Go ahead Aztlanians, try to lull us asleep with this unmitigated crap.
As in "light the fuse." I have seen MECHA literature urging "La Reconquista" of Aztlan, one baby at a time. One House at a time. One street at a time. One Town at a time. One State at a time, until Aztlan, which is Northern Occupied Mexico, is reunited with Mexico
Aztec mythology claims that their people originated "in the north" and migrated southwards when changing weather and enemies forced them to find a new homeland. This claim is actually supported by archaeology, and indicates that they moved out of northwestern Mexico to south-central Mexico just over a thousand years ago. When they got there, they ran into the more civilized descendants of the Toltec culture, adopted their technologies, and eventually built the Aztec nations that we're more familiar with.
Aztlan was likely a real place, though it's unlikely that it was in the US. Even if it did, they were a primitive tribal people at that time (like many of the desert indian tribes that the American settlers encountered) so their paradise was a bit more primitive than some of them like to admit.
"The Aztecs lived in CENTRAL MEXICO - not the SW"
Doesn't matter. If they are culturally powerful enough in this country to tell us to STFU then they win. It's hard for Western Culture to prevail when our leaders betray us and our population has been subjected to forty years of propaganda telling us how we're a bunch of miserable sh*ts and OWE the third world everything we have. This will wind up in a shooting war.
Protect our borders and coastlines from all foreign invaders!
Support our Minutemen Patriots!
Be Ever Vigilant ~ Bump!
But I think in Aztec mythology the Aztecs originated near Colorado and migrated to the area of today's Mexico City. Where the Aztec empire was established
By the 13th century the entire region, then called the Valley of Anahuac, was occupied by assorted rival city-states. Among the last to arrive on the scene was the nomadic tribe of the Mexica (pronounced may-SHEE-ka), more commonly known as the Aztecs, who ended a long migration from their northern homeland, Aztlan, by settling in the Valley marshlands.
The Aztecs considered themselves the chosen people of the sun and war god Huitzilopochtli. After coming upon an eagle perched on a cactus devouring a snake, a sign foretold in ancient tribal prophecy, the Aztecs founded Tenochtitlan, their capital, on an island in Lake Texcoco. They sustained themselves there for half a century by acting as mercenaries for the mighty Tepanecs of Azcapotzalco, but eventually rose up against their rulers, effectively seizing power over the valley.
And mexico will be crushed once again if that happened.
The number of Mexicans living in what is now the United States BEFORE the US-Mexico war in 1846 was miniscule.
For example, by 1835 when Texas became independent, there were thousands more Americans in Texas than the Hispanics who originally tried to colonize the territory according to an official Mexican census.
The Mexicans' claim to have inheirited the US territory from Spain which simply claimed virtually everything on the continent because of their early explorations doesn't hold up too well when you add up the numbers.
Oh I wish I still had the link I used to have to an Aztlan take over America group website. That site leaves NO doubt about their goal of capturing much of our west and calling it Aztlan. They even have a map of their "Aztlan country" they wish to form out of the western United States.
I also found out that they go after anyone who speaks out against them or their web site. That they are infiltrating our colleges with groups for what ever reason I do not know.
One of their leaders from that web site used to write propaganda against the United States and post it on Arab web sites to incite them against America. I ran a search on his writings and this person was VERY anti-Semitic. Telling them that UPC codes and something on our kitchen products proved that we were working with the Jews and that that's why they should hate us and kill us. It was crazy!
I also learned that the FBI has been watching this group for years. And they've even found flyer's from this group out in California after some of their meetings that promote violence and the take over of our western states.
The Aztlan movement fosters pride and enthusiasm among its members with pseudo-history and racism, just like other fascist movements of the 20th century.
"And mexico will be crushed once again if that happened."
Crush your enemies,
drive them before you,
and hear the lamnetations of their women.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.