i received a private reponse to an earlier statement i made "it is a liberal's dream to have every single family in the entire country on the dole of the federal government" stating "Privately, I agree with you." and went on to explain.
this from an individual here that strongly defends FairTax (in this thread) -- i can only assume that it was a private reply because they did not want to be attacked and labeled as "adamantly opposed" (humorous).
so, no, i have to disagree with you that.
the problem is the attack machine that is requiring fairtax supporters to be of one mind on all issues.
I know the poster to whom you refer and have discussed this particular point with him (plus another which we do not agree on) and we certainly do not agre on these two points but both support the FirTax despite the two disaagreements.
The point of my telling you that is that your assumption of why he disclosed that to you was not the "adamantly opposed" apellation at all. That is merely one other error on your part. It is because of a laundry list of points of opposition that you respond with that you have earned the name - many of which laundry list are routine (and repeated) themes of admitted opponents to the FairTax.
So you're quite wrong about all FairTax swupporters being universally in lockstep. It is not true - there is no such "problem". However when you clearly misstate things as you have done on this thread you will certainly be receiving comments to the contrary. Perhaps you cant't take that.