So, let's see Nightie, you'd rather see all of the funding run ou [sic] for everyone so no one gets any financial help despite the lgal [sic] requirements??? How socialistic of you.I don't want the funding to run out but how would that be socialistic? You want to take money from people with a lot of investment and savings income and give it to people with less. That's socialistic.
"You want to take money from people with a lot of investment and savings income and give it to people with less."
Another misleading SQL statement on this thread - how many does that make?
FairTaxers want to tax Americans on what they CONSUME (regardless of the source of the funds used for that consumption), rather than on their income. Those with high levels of investment and savings income can elect to pay no taxes on a net basis if they so choose. To the extent they CHOOSE to consume at higher levels, they will pay for that.
I never did see a response to Conservative Goddess's question a few posts ago about what YOUR plan to address Social Security's problems is. But I'm not holding my breath.