Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jwalsh07

I agree with the judge from what I know. Granted there is a legal issue that may be unresolved, as to whether it is legal to exchange soft money for hard money via a third party to circumvent a campaign finance limitation.


216 posted on 12/05/2005 2:04:22 PM PST by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies ]


To: Torie
Before we get to the facts of the case at trial we have to get to the facts of the third grand jury indictment on money laundering and conspiracy.

If the news accounts were correct and Mr Ronnie Earle hustled an indictment through GJIII, within a couple of hours of their reporting for duty, by telling them that members of GJI siad they would have indicted Delay on the new charges while keeping from them the fact that GJII issued a statement saying that Earle didn't have the goods the ballgame is over.

Delay walks, Ronnie Earle bites the big one.

BTW, that's the big game, both DeGuerin and Earle knew that the bill obtained in GJI was gonna get tossed.

278 posted on 12/05/2005 2:38:42 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson