[js1138]

Do you agree with Templeton, Giberson and Science & Theology in their entirety or are you just agreeing with the anti-ID part?The only thing about ID that I oppose is the notion that you can put an idea into science classrooms that is unsupported by research and which cannot be researched.

If you look at the manifesto of the Discovery Institute it is clear that they are not promoting a theory in the sense that the big bang is a theory. They are trying to change the definition of science, to remove empiricism from science.

[pby]

And The John Templeton Foundation doesn't?