To: Diamond
The burden of proof is on the Darwinist... Not when the ID'er advances an affirmative claim - e.g., X is impossible. Then they take on the burden of supporting such a claim.
To: Senator Bedfellow
Not when the ID'er advances an affirmative claim - e.g., X is impossible The claim is that the Darwinian mechanism is causally insufficient, not that it is inconceivable or logically impossible.
Cordially,
666 posted on
12/06/2005 12:13:58 PM PST by
Diamond
(Qui liberatio scelestus trucido inculpatus.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson