To: CarolinaGuitarman
10123 is not a probability.
He probably just cut and pasted the entire block of text from a creationist website without attribution, plagarizing it and presenting it as his own work and losing the code for superscript in the process. Likely he meant 10123.
He might also have meant 10123, which we know is a rather large number (though not quite as large as 1720).
59 posted on
12/05/2005 6:39:34 AM PST by
Dimensio
(http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
To: Dimensio
He might also have meant 010123, which is really really hugh.
67 posted on
12/05/2005 6:44:05 AM PST by
oblomov
To: Dimensio
I know he didn't mean 10123. It's just that it's the second time in a few days that I have seen this same mistake being made in these threads. And it was early and I felt like being a smart ass. :)
79 posted on
12/05/2005 6:54:09 AM PST by
CarolinaGuitarman
("There is a grandeur in this view of life...")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson