[pby]

Any museum that displays sinosauroptyrex with feathers is misrepresenting the truth to the public (and most museums do...as it is considered to be one of the most definitive fossils in the dinosaur to bird evolutionary "theory").

As it turns out, it was just wishful thinking on many evolutionists part...There are no feathers on this fossil. (They were even warned, in 1997, at the finding of the fossil but they were so zealous for a transitional that it was deemed to be feathered before more rigorous study could be done.)

Any museum that talks about a single cell evolving out of a primordial ooze some million/billion years ago is labeling an assumption as science (misrepresenting what the evidence states).

Any museum that shows a clean, straight, line of monkey to ape to human evolution is misrepresenting what is scientifically theorized (common ancestor...no clean lines).

etc.

[VadeRetro]

Any museum that displays sinosauroptyrex with feathers is misrepresenting the truth to the public (and most museums do...as it is considered to be one of the most definitive fossils in the dinosaur to bird evolutionary "theory").

Funny they pretty much all still do that. Maybe Alan Feduccia is a crackpot?

[CarolinaGuitarman]

"Any museum that displays sinosauroptyrex with feathers is misrepresenting the truth to the public (and most museums do...as it is considered to be one of the most definitive fossils in the dinosaur to bird evolutionary "theory")."

There is a debate over whether they were feathers with Sinosauropteryx. There certainly WERE feathered dinosaurs though.

"Any museum that talks about a single cell evolving out of a primordial ooze some million/billion years ago is labeling an assumption as science (misrepresenting what the evidence states)."

And they wouldn't be talking about evolution, they would be talking about abiogenesis.

"Any museum that shows a clean, straight, line of monkey to ape to human evolution is misrepresenting what is scientifically theorized (common ancestor...no clean lines)."

There is ample evidence that we DID evolve from ancestral primates. Fossil, morphological, and DNA evidence. Any museum that equivocated on this would be lying to the public about what we know.