Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MissAmericanPie
Speaking as a believer, I think science would be aided in it's advancement by not ignoring the 100% accuracy of the Bible regarding physics.

Does this 100% accuracy extend to the global flood, at around 4200-4300 years ago?

165 posted on 12/05/2005 9:10:53 AM PST by Coyoteman (I love the sound of beta decay in the morning!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]


To: Coyoteman

I find it interesting that many ancient civilizations record a great flood that happened in the earliest time of man, from the Cherokee nation to the Myans.

The word used in the original text can mean both world wide and a certain area. The more interesting revelation of that time is the fact that before the flood it had not rained on the face of the earth. According to scripture everything was watered by a mist that rose from the ground.

This time according to science was pre-man. Yet the Bible clearly states that it had not rained until the flood at the time of Noah, so man was present earlier than science records. Pre-flood there had been no rainbow. So evidently this flood marked a great change in earth's atmosphere.

Science has had to correct itself many times, not so with scriptures. Eventually science falls in line with them and it's silly to ignore that fact.


744 posted on 12/07/2005 5:33:46 AM PST by MissAmericanPie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson