Skip to comments.
Intelligent design’s long march to nowhere
Science & Theology News ^
| 05 December 2005
| Karl Giberson
Posted on 12/05/2005 4:06:56 AM PST by PatrickHenry
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 861-875 next last
To: pby
What were Darwin's education and qualifications and did not he dictate the course of science?
That was not my quote however I will answer. Darwin was a Doctor engaged in the study and observation of plant and animal life. He chose a ships commission in order to enhance his travel and study. Although he is credited with a lot his ideas were not that new. Aristotle, the father of science speculated much of the same ideas centuries before the bible and its new ideas was written.
101
posted on
12/05/2005 7:31:23 AM PST
by
jec41
(Screaming Eagle)
To: Clemenza
"IDers will go the way of ... Baseball Card Economists."
Just so I can understand the analogy, exactly what is a "Baseball Card Economist"?
To: Rudder
Exactly one-half of the population of America has an IQ of 100 or less.It seems that somebody needs to be educated on the difference between a mean and a median. Perhaps you should stick to your area of specialization.
103
posted on
12/05/2005 7:34:06 AM PST
by
AmishDude
(Your corporate slogan could be here! FReepmail me for my confiscatory rates.)
To: Senator Bedfellow
Exactly, or presidential candidate and early ID proponent William Jennings Bryan. Long and Bryan were hardly conservatives in the sense of a belief in limited government. They were "conservative" because they opposed modernity, Bryan advancing a pre-modern guild employment system that was not so different from Long's flirtation with fascism.
104
posted on
12/05/2005 7:37:17 AM PST
by
oblomov
To: Senator Bedfellow
If only we weren't so thick-headed, we'd be able to see how 1 is equivalent to 2.6...
I suppose for sufficiently large values of 1 and sufficiently small values of 2.6...
105
posted on
12/05/2005 7:37:53 AM PST
by
Dimensio
(http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
To: Rudder
How did they do this? Was the same test used for all countries?
Yep, non biased based on mathematics.
106
posted on
12/05/2005 7:38:46 AM PST
by
jec41
(Screaming Eagle)
To: antiRepublicrat
Scientific American had a specuial supplement that discussed parallel universes. What I described was a Type I based on the classification scheme given. Type II was based on quantum mechanics. When a quantum 'event' become manifest, all probability outcomes become real, but our universe only follows one path of outcomes. I can't remember the Type III but I think it was based on Brane theory.
107
posted on
12/05/2005 7:40:11 AM PST
by
doc30
(Democrats are to morals what and Etch-A-Sketch is to Art.)
To: jec41
Strange. I have graduate courses in testing and have never heard of an unbiased test.
Lots of people have tried to make unbiased, but it's pretty futile.
108
posted on
12/05/2005 7:41:27 AM PST
by
js1138
(Great is the power of steady misrepresentation.)
To: antiRepublicrat
Sorry, since you divided by (a-b), this equality holds only if a <> b. So a and b both can't be 1.
109
posted on
12/05/2005 7:42:26 AM PST
by
oblomov
To: AmishDude
Re: mean and median
see post 97.
110
posted on
12/05/2005 7:43:32 AM PST
by
Rudder
To: oblomov
Sorry, since you divided by (a-b), this equality holds only if a <> b. So a and b both can't be 1. I think he is aware of that. The proof in his post is a very famous one.
To: Rudder
You said "exactly". Don't use a single example to generalize to all results.
112
posted on
12/05/2005 7:46:05 AM PST
by
AmishDude
(Your corporate slogan could be here! FReepmail me for my confiscatory rates.)
To: antiRepublicrat
If a probability is more than zero, it will probably happen given infinity.
More precisely, if the probability of an event is more than zero, it will occur with probability approaching one as the number of repeated trials increases without limit.
I'm familiar with the joke proof that 1 = 2, but thanks for the laugh.
To: All
if evolution is true and homosexuality is genetic - why are there still homosexuals? wouldn't this non reproductive gene have been eliminated from the gene pool at some point? when it comes to science, i'm one of those ignoramuses who believes that God created man in His own image and homosexuality is a choice that people make.
114
posted on
12/05/2005 7:50:51 AM PST
by
Snowbelt Man
(ideas have consequences)
To: Rudder
Yeah...speciation in progress.
What it really means is that if your IQ is 135 or above and you have have a argument, debate, or discourse with someone with a IQ of a 100 or less you are wasting your time and their time. Neither will ever be able to accept the others position.
115
posted on
12/05/2005 7:50:56 AM PST
by
jec41
(Screaming Eagle)
To: js1138
And The John Templeton Foundation doesn't?
116
posted on
12/05/2005 7:51:18 AM PST
by
pby
To: AmishDude
Delete exactly and insert hyperbole...'cause that's what I was doing.
117
posted on
12/05/2005 7:51:51 AM PST
by
Rudder
To: jec41
Darwin was a doctor with a completed medical degree?
118
posted on
12/05/2005 7:52:37 AM PST
by
pby
To: jec41
...you are wasting your time and their time. Neither will ever be able to accept the others position.Or, Murphey's Law of Speciation No. 322: "Don't go to bed with someone dumber than yourself."
119
posted on
12/05/2005 7:54:30 AM PST
by
Rudder
To: Doctor Stochastic
"Of course, if the French hadn't won at Hastings, we'd all be speaking English now."
No creo eso!
120
posted on
12/05/2005 7:54:32 AM PST
by
MHalblaub
(Tell me in four more years (No, I did not vote for Kerry))
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 861-875 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson