Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: txradioguy

The penetration of a 16" shell is tremendous. A true 'bunkerbuster'.
Not many bombs have the capability of them.

At Iwo Jima we bombed the Japanese pillboxes with little results. Location of some of the pillboxes in the side of Mt. Surabachi also negated the effectiveness of bombs. It was 16" shells from battleships offshore that penetrated and neutralize them.
I know we have penetrator bombs but don't know whether they are as effective as a 16" shell.


174 posted on 12/05/2005 11:18:41 AM PST by Vinnie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Vinnie

The heaviest bomb carried by Navy/Marine aircraft was probably a 500-lb GP bomb. It would have been delivered in a shallow dive -- probably not very accurate when you're trying to hit a cave entrance (nor would it penetrate all that far as you said). Todays aircraft delivered weapons would tend to be a lot more accurate and penetrate much further.


190 posted on 12/05/2005 1:33:29 PM PST by Tallguy (When it's a bet between reality and delusion, bet on reality -- Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies ]

To: Vinnie

A GPS thousand pound bomb going through the airvent or door or window somewhere around the speed of sound will do more than a 16" shell ever thought about.

But as said before, a battleship sitting just on the edge of the horizon would be a scary ass thing to see.

But then, just blowing up without seeing what hit you (say a hellfire from a loitering predator) is pretty darn scary, too.


198 posted on 12/05/2005 2:48:24 PM PST by MeanWestTexan (Many at FR would respond to Christ "Darn right, I'll cast the first stone!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson