The doctors actions go against many principles in the scientific community, according to Stanford bioethicist David Magnus, who said: Science depends upon the honesty of the people who submit articles. The whole system would come crashing down without it. Maybe science should also begin to concern itself with morality.
1 posted on
12/04/2005 4:44:13 PM PST by
wagglebee
To: Coleus; narses
Embryonic stem cell ping.
2 posted on
12/04/2005 4:45:39 PM PST by
wagglebee
("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
To: thompsonsjkc; odoso; animoveritas; mercygrace; Laissez-faire capitalist; bellevuesbest; ...
Moral Absolutes ping.
I am helping little jeremiah out with this ping list for a few days.
3 posted on
12/04/2005 4:46:35 PM PST by
wagglebee
("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
To: wagglebee
In a shocking breach of medical ethics, the leading stem-cell and cloning researcher in South Korea admitted last week that he used eggs donated by subordinates in his work.
No kidding. Because people like this are scum to the core. I'm about as suprised to hear about ehtical violations by a cloner/embryonic stem cell researcher as I am from an abortionist.
To: wagglebee
Some areas of science are definitely not concerned with ethics or morality, or more likely have built their own modern codes that are more convenient for them.
Wolf
6 posted on
12/04/2005 4:58:39 PM PST by
RunningWolf
(Vet US Army Air Cav 1975)
To: 2ndMostConservativeBrdMember; afraidfortherepublic; Alas; al_c; american colleen; annalex; ...
8 posted on
12/04/2005 5:08:28 PM PST by
Coleus
(Roe v. Wade and Endangered Species Act both passed in 1973, Murder Babies/save trees, birds, algae)
To: wagglebee; Coleus
What about the ethical violation of using any embryo?
10 posted on
12/04/2005 5:29:22 PM PST by
Irish_Thatcherite
(~~~A vote for Bertie Ahern is a vote for Gerry Adams!~~~)
To: Stultis
Ping--thought you might like an example.
15 posted on
12/04/2005 6:34:25 PM PST by
Mamzelle
To: wagglebee
Is is possible that a man of science is a corrupt jerk? I thought a commitment to science somehow make you holier than other human beings...?
16 posted on
12/04/2005 6:38:06 PM PST by
Mamzelle
To: wagglebee
This is a pure evil misdirection ploy ... the unethical was conceiving embryo-aged humans in order to rip out their body parts (their stem cells), not the 'unethical' acquiring of donor ova.
19 posted on
12/06/2005 1:59:38 PM PST by
MHGinTN
(If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote life support for others.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson